Pim Brands Inc v. Haribo of America Inc
Plaintiff / Appellant: PIM BRANDS INC
Defendant / Appellee: HARIBO OF AMERICA INC
Case Number: 22-2821
Filed: September 30, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 7, 2023 Summary Pim Brands Inc v. Haribo of America Inc.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2022 Filing 18 Appellant Pim Brands Inc verbally granted an extension of time to file brief & appendix until 12/12/2022. pursuant to Third Cir. LAR 31.4. (SB) [Entered: 10/20/2022 03:38 PM]
October 17, 2022 Filing 17 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Pim Brands Inc due on or before 11/28/2022. Appendix due on or before 11/28/2022. (SB) [Entered: 10/17/2022 01:34 PM]
October 14, 2022 Filing 16 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Tamara A. Miller on behalf of Appellee(s) Haribo of America, Inc.. [22-2821] (TM) [Entered: 10/14/2022 02:40 PM]
October 14, 2022 Filing 15 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Michael Cukor on behalf of Appellee(s) Haribo of America, Inc.. [22-2821] (MC) [Entered: 10/14/2022 02:05 PM]
October 14, 2022 Filing 14 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Richard S. Mandel on behalf of Appellant(s) PIM Brands Inc.. [22-2821] (RSM) [Entered: 10/14/2022 09:47 AM]
October 14, 2022 Filing 13 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jonathan Z. King on behalf of Appellant(s) PIM Brands Inc.. [22-2821] (JZK) [Entered: 10/14/2022 09:46 AM]
October 13, 2022 Filing 12 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Pim Brands Inc. [22-2821] (LK) [Entered: 10/13/2022 06:00 PM]
October 13, 2022 Filing 11 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Pim Brands Inc advising this court that no transcripts are available. [22-2821] (LK) [Entered: 10/13/2022 06:00 PM]
October 13, 2022 Filing 10 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Pim Brands Inc. [22-2821] (LK) [Entered: 10/13/2022 05:59 PM]
October 13, 2022 Filing 9 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Pim Brands Inc. [22-2821] (LK) [Entered: 10/13/2022 05:58 PM]
October 13, 2022 Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Leah Kelman on behalf of Appellant(s) PIM Brands Inc.. [22-2821] (LK) [Entered: 10/13/2022 05:57 PM]
October 13, 2022 Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from David R. King on behalf of Appellant(s) PIM Brands Inc.. [22-2821] (DRK) [Entered: 10/13/2022 05:51 PM]
October 13, 2022 Filing 6 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Haribo of America Inc. [22-2821] (ML) [Entered: 10/13/2022 12:15 PM]
October 13, 2022 Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Mark J. Liss on behalf of Appellee(s) Haribo of America, Inc.. [22-2821] (ML) [Entered: 10/13/2022 12:13 PM]
October 13, 2022 Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Laura M. Schaefer on behalf of Appellee(s) Haribo of America. [22-2821] (LS) [Entered: 10/13/2022 12:10 PM]
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER (Clerk) It is noted that the District Court opinion on appeal and other portions of this case are sealed in the District Court. Because it is sealed, the Clerk has not filed the District Courts opinion on this Courts docket. Any party who wishes to continue the seal must file a motion pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 106.1(c)(2) within thirty days of the date the notice of appeal was filed or the seal will be lifted and the opinion will be added to the docket without restriction. Any motion under 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 106.1(c)(2) should specify the scope of the relief requested, including the basis for sealing and the desired duration of the sealing order. The motion should also address any ruling by the District Court on the September 14, 2022 motion to seal pending at No. 95. If any party intends to file other sealed documents with the Court during the appeal, the filing party must file an appropriate motion to seal, submit the documents separately, and title the filing as SEALED. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 106.1(a). The parties are directed to use the CM/ECF events preceded by the word SEALED whenever filing any documents which may contain sealed material. All hard copies of documents submitted to this Court should be properly labeled that they are SEALED and provided in a clearly marked envelope (SB) [Entered: 09/30/2022 11:24 AM]
September 30, 2022 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 09/30/2022 11:19 AM]
September 30, 2022 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Pim Brands Inc in District Court No. 2-19-cv-14183. (SB) [Entered: 09/30/2022 11:15 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Pim Brands Inc v. Haribo of America Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PIM BRANDS INC
Represented By: Leah Kelman Esq.
Represented By: David R. King Esq.
Represented By: Jonathan Z. King Esq.
Represented By: Richard S. Mandel Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HARIBO OF AMERICA INC
Represented By: Michael Cukor Esq.
Represented By: Mark Liss Esq.
Represented By: Tamara Miller Esq.
Represented By: Laura Schaefer Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?