Abdul Shabazz v. Vincent Carr
| ABDUL HAQQ SHABAZZ |
| DR. VINCENT CARR |
| BALLARD SPAHR LLP, MATTHEW G. SUMMERS, BRITTANY M. GIUSINI, BRITTANY M. WILSON, Esq. and MICHAEL R. MCDONALD, Esq. |
| 22-2825 |
| October 4, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1(a), for failure to pay the filing fee for the notice of appeal. Case terminated on 11/29/2022. [22-2824, 22-2825] (LMR) [Entered: 11/29/2022 10:52 AM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion is granted to the extent Appellant requests an extension of time to file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Appellant must file an affidavit of poverty, along with an addendum to the affidavit in support of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, a completed form authorizing assessments to be made from his prison account, and a certified prison account statement within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. Action on Appellants request to stay the case and for extension time to file a response to the Legal Division letter dated October 7, 2022, is deferred pending the resolution of the fee matter. Failure to file the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the accompanying documents within the time stated will result in dismissal of the appeal pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1 without further notice. [22-2824, 22-2825]. (PDB) [Entered: 11/09/2022 10:20 AM]
|
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: RESPONSE on behalf of Appellees Brittany M. Giusini, Ballard Spahr LLP, Michael R. McDonald, Esq., Matthew G. Summers and Brittany M. Wilson, Esq. in 22-2824, 22-2825 in support of dismissal of the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Certificate of Service dated 10/28/2022 by US mail. [22-2824, 22-2825] (MGS) [Entered: 10/28/2022 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Victoria R. Sweeney on behalf of Appellee(s) Vincent Carr. [22-2825] (VRS) [Entered: 10/25/2022 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Zi-Xiang Shen on behalf of Appellee(s) Vincent Carr. [22-2825] (ZS) [Entered: 10/25/2022 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Abdul Haqq Shabazz for Extension of Time to Pay Fee(s), to Extend Time to File Response to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 10/27/2022. Service made by US mail. [22-2824, 22-2825] (LMR) [Entered: 10/28/2022 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 6 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Zi-Xiang Shen, Esq. for Vincent Carr and Victoria R. Sweeney, Esq. for Vincent Carr requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 11/07/2022. (LMR) [Entered: 10/24/2022 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Ballard Spahr LLP. [22-2825] (MGS) [Entered: 10/18/2022 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Matthew G. Summers on behalf of Respondent(s) Ballard Spahr LLP, Matthew G. Summers, Brittany M. Giusini, Brittany M. Wilson, and Michael R. McDonald. [22-2825] (MGS) [Entered: 10/18/2022 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (ZM) [Entered: 10/07/2022 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 10/04/2022 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Abdul Haqq Shabazz in District Court No. 1-19-cv-01909. (LMR) [Entered: 10/04/2022 10:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
