Curtis Jones v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
| CURTIS JONES |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON |
| 22-2854 |
| October 6, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Nancy A. Hulett on behalf of Appellee(s) Attorney General of New Jersey, Bruce Davis, Administrator. [22-2854] (NAH) [Entered: 11/30/2022 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Nancy A. Hulett, Esq. for Attorney General New Jersey and Administrator New Jersey State Prison requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 12/07/2022.--[Edited 11/30/2022 by JK] (JK) [Entered: 11/30/2022 01:51 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) the District Court denied the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, Appellant Curtis Jones must pay the docketing fees or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this order,. (JK) [Entered: 11/30/2022 01:45 PM]
|
| Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability AND advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (ZM) [Entered: 10/11/2022 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 10/06/2022 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Curtis Jones in District Court No. 3-20-cv-02945. (JK) [Entered: 10/06/2022 02:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
