Amy Spahr, et al v. Amy Collins, et al
| AMY SPAHR and MATTHEW CAIN |
| AMY COLLINS and RAMONA MIRA |
| 22-2879 |
| October 19, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellants Amy Spahr and Matthew Cain. [22-2879] (RSB) [Entered: 12/12/2022 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 14 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellants Matthew Cain and Amy Spahr advising this court that. [22-2879] (RSB) [Entered: 12/12/2022 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellants Amy Spahr and Matthew Cain. [22-2879] (RSB) [Entered: 12/12/2022 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellants Matthew Cain and Amy Spahr to Clerk Order dated 10/19/22. Certificate of Service dated 12/12/2022. [22-2879] (RSB) [Entered: 12/12/2022 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellants Matthew Cain and Amy Spahr. [22-2879] (RSB) [Entered: 12/12/2022 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ORDER (Clerk): The plaintiffs' extension motion is granted as follows. An attorney has now appeared on their behalf. The plaintiffs case-opening forms (civil information statement, disclosure statement, concise summary of the case, and transcript purchase order form) must be filed within fourteen days of this order or their appeal may be dismissed. Any responses regarding the jurisdictional issues raised by the Clerk must also be filed within fourteen days of this order. [22-2787, 22-2879] (RFH) [Entered: 11/28/2022 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 9 Document removed as duplicative filed on 11/28/22 at Docket Entry No. 8. (RSB) [Entered: 11/28/2022 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert S. Bria on behalf of Appellant(s) Amy Spahr; Matthew Cain. [22-2787, 22-2879] (RSB) [Entered: 11/28/2022 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellees Matthew Cain and Amy Spahr in 22-2787, Appellants Matthew Cain and Amy Spahr in 22-2879 requesting a two-week extension for an attorney to enter their appearance in the above cases. Certificate of Service dated 11/02/2022. Service made by Email. [22-2787, 22-2879] (LMR) [Entered: 11/15/2022 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellees Amy Collins and Ramona Mira to advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 11/02/2022. [22-2879] (RMK) [Entered: 11/02/2022 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert M. Kleiner on behalf of Appellee(s) Amy Collins and Ramona Mirro. [22-2879] (RMK) [Entered: 11/02/2022 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Andrew R. Fletcher on behalf of Appellee(s) Amy Collins; Ramona Mirro. [22-2879] (ARF) [Entered: 10/31/2022 10:32 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) In this cross-appeal, the plaintiffs seek review of an order that dismissed some but not allof their claims. The order was not certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) and may not be a final decision[] under 28 U.S.C. 1291 or otherwise appealable. See generally Aluminum Co. of Am. v. Beazer E., Inc., 124 F.3d 551, 557 (3d Cir. 1997) ([T]here is no final order if claims remain unresolved and their resolution is to occur in the district court.). All parties must file written responses addressing this issue within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. (LMR) [Entered: 10/19/2022 02:14 PM]
|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 10/19/2022 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Matthew Cain and Amy Spahr in District Court No. 1-19-cv-00113. (LMR) [Entered: 10/19/2022 02:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
