Mark Mazza, et alIn re: Mark Mazza, et al
| In re: MARK MAZZA and LISA MAZZA |
| BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, ASTRUSTEE FOR THECERTIFCATEHOLDERS OF THE CWALT,INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-0A10 MORTGAGE PASS-TRHOUGHCERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-0A10 and EDUARDO C. ROBRENO |
| 22-3053 |
| November 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioners Lisa Mazza and Mark Mazza requesting It is noted that on October 28, 2022, Petitioners filed the above-captioned petition for writ of mandamus in the existing appeal docketed at No. 21-1856. As a petition for writ of mandamus is an original proceeding, it has been assigned a new case number and Petitioners must pay a new filing fee. There is a $500 docketing fee for this petition. Because Petitioners did not submit the fee or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the mandamus petition, action on the petition is deferred. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, Petitioners must either remit payment of the $500.00 filing fee or each file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit. A form affidavit is enclosed for Petitioners convenience. If the filing fee is not paid or the motion is not filed, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 107.1. (PDB) [Entered: 11/02/2022 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioners Lisa Mazza and Mark Mazza. (PDB) [Entered: 11/02/2022 01:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
