Bezalel Grossberger v. Superior Court of Essex County, et al
| BEZALEL GROSSBERGER |
| ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, FAST OIL LLC and ROBERT CORMACK |
| 22-3110 |
| November 8, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Bezalel Grossberger v. Superior Court of Essex County |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER (HARDIMAN, BIBAS and FREEMAN, Circuit Judges) denying motion to reconsider order filed by Appellant Bezalel Grossberger. Panel No.: ACO-022. Hardiman, Authoring Judge. (SB) [Entered: 12/23/2022 02:17 PM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Bezalel Grossberger to Reconsider Order dated 12/12/2022. Response due on 12/23/2022. Certificate of Service dated 12/13/2022. Service made by Email. (SB) [Entered: 12/14/2022 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Bezalel Grossberger due on or before 01/23/2023. Appendix due on or before 01/23/2023. (TMM) [Entered: 12/12/2022 09:57 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER (BIBAS, Circuit Judge) The foregoing motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and for expedited consideration of the appeal is denied. To the extent that Appellant seeks an order enjoining ongoing state court proceedings, his request for injunction relief is barred by the Anti-Injunction Act. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of America Sales Practice Litig., 261 F. 3d 355, 364 (3d Cir. 2001) (recognizing that the Anti-Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. Section 2283, "is an absolute prohibition against enjoining state court proceedings unless the injunction falls within one of three specifically defined exceptions") (citation omitted). His motion for a TRO otherwise fails to make a colorable showing of irreparable harm. See Kos Pharm., Inc. v. Andrx Corp., 369 F. 3d 700, 708 (3d Cir. 2004). Appellant has failed to demonstrate a basis for granting expedited review. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 4.1 (providing that a motion to expedite an appeal should only be granted for "exceptional reasons"). Panel No.: ALD-047. Bibas, Authoring Judge. (TMM) [Entered: 12/12/2022 09:53 AM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION filed by Appellant Bezalel Grossberger for temporary restraining order and for expedited consideration . Response due on 11/21/2022. Certificate of Service dated 11/09/2022. Service made by Email. (SB) [Entered: 11/10/2022 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 11/08/2022 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Bezalel Grossberger in District Court No. 2-22-cv-05484. (SB) [Entered: 11/08/2022 09:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
