Francienna Grant, et al v. William Panico
FRANCIENNA B. GRANT |
WILLIAM HUNTLEY PANICO |
WILLIAM H PANICO DMD |
22-3141 |
November 18, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Medical Malpractice |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Appellant's Brief Received. As no briefing schedule has yet issued, the brief is construed as a document in support of the appeal. If after disposition of the pending motions the appeal is to proceed to briefing, the parties will be advised regarding the filing date of this brief and the date for filing a responsive brief. (SLC) [Entered: 12/28/2022 11:26 AM] |
Filing 6 Notice received from the district court that the docketing and filing fees were paid by the appellant on 11/30/2022. (CJG) [Entered: 12/21/2022 04:45 PM] |
Filing 5 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 11/29/2022 02:53 PM] |
Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from CHARLES B. AUSTERMUHL, ESQUIRE on behalf of Respondent(s) WILLIAM HUNTLEY PANICO, WILLIAM H. PANICO, D.M.D.. [22-3141] (CBA) [Entered: 11/21/2022 11:22 AM] |
Filing 3 Certified Copy of Amended Notice of Appeal filed 11/17/2022 received from Clerk of District Court. (SLC) [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:24 AM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SLC) [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:23 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Francienna B. Grant in District Court No. 1-19-cv-20535. (SLC) [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.