Rasheen Mines v. USA
| RASHEEN MINES |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 22-3159 |
| November 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee USA in 22-3122, 22-3123, 22-3158, 22-3159 to to request certificate of appealability. Certificate of Service dated 12/08/2022. [22-3122, 22-3123, 22-3158, 22-3159] (SGS) [Entered: 12/08/2022 05:55 PM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant William Brown in 22-3122, Appellant William Hernandez in 22-3123, Appellant Lawrence Johnson in 22-3158, Appellant Mr. Rasheen Mines in 22-3159 for issuance of certificate of appealability. Certificate of Service dated 12/08/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-3122, 22-3123, 22-3158, 22-3159] (JAM) [Entered: 12/08/2022 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Mr. Rasheen Mines. [22-3159] (JAM) [Entered: 11/22/2022 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant William Brown in 22-3122, Appellant William Hernandez in 22-3123, Appellant Lawrence Johnson in 22-3158, Appellant Mr. Rasheen Mines in 22-3159 advising this court that no transcripts are available. [22-3122, 22-3123, 22-3158, 22-3159] (JAM) [Entered: 11/22/2022 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Julie A. McGrain on behalf of Appellant William Brown, William Hernandez, Lawrence Johnson, Rasheen Mines. [22-3122, 22-3123, 22-3158, 22-3159]--[Edited 11/23/2022 by PDB] (JAM) [Entered: 11/22/2022 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 6 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (SH) [Entered: 11/22/2022 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Steven G. Sanders, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) United States of America. [22-3158, 22-3159] (SGS) [Entered: 11/18/2022 05:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Mark E. Coyne, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) United States of America. [22-3158, 22-3159] (MEC) [Entered: 11/18/2022 05:36 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) appointing FPD to represent Appellant Mr. Rasheen Mines. (LMR) [Entered: 11/18/2022 03:31 PM]
|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 11/18/2022 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Rasheen Mines in District Court No. 1-16-cv-03796. (LMR) [Entered: 11/18/2022 03:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rasheen Mines v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: RASHEEN MINES | |
| Represented By: | Julie A. McGrain Esq. |
| Represented By: | Thomas Young Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Mark E. Coyne Esq. |
| Represented By: | Steven G. Sanders Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
