Acrison Inc v. Anthony Rainone, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: ACRISON INC
Defendant / Appellee: ANTHONY M. RAINONE, an individual, BRACH EICHLER LLC, a New Jersey limited liability corporation, XCELLENCE INC, directly and as successor-in-interest to RVM ENTERPRISES, INC., DBA Xact Data Discovery and JOHN P. MARTIN, an individual
Case Number: 22-3274
Filed: December 1, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 24, 2023 Acrison Inc v. Anthony Rainone

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2023 Filing 16 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from William H. Yost, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) Xcellence Inc.. [22-3274] (WHY) [Entered: 01/05/2023 02:49 PM]
January 5, 2023 Filing 15 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Xcellence Inc. [22-3274] (WHY) [Entered: 01/05/2023 02:35 PM]
January 4, 2023 Filing 14 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Acrison Inc. [22-3274] (PG) [Entered: 01/04/2023 02:49 PM]
January 4, 2023 Filing 13 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Acrison Inc advising this court that no transcripts are available. [22-3274] (PG) [Entered: 01/04/2023 01:55 PM]
January 4, 2023 Filing 12 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Acrison Inc. [22-3274] (PG) [Entered: 01/04/2023 01:53 PM]
December 21, 2022 Filing 11 FOLLOW UP LETTER to William H. Yost, Esq. for Xcellence Inc requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 01/04/2023. Disclosure Statement on or before 01/04/2023. (JK) [Entered: 12/21/2022 12:11 PM]
December 21, 2022 Filing 10 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Peter Goldberger, Esq. for Acrison Inc and Dennis T. Kearney, Esq. for Acrison Inc requesting the following document(s): Information Statement on or before 01/04/2023. Concise Summary on or before 01/04/2023. Transcript Purchase Order on or before 01/04/2023. (JK) [Entered: 12/21/2022 12:04 PM]
December 15, 2022 Filing 9 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Peter Goldberger on behalf of Appellant(s) Acrison, Inc.. [22-3274] (PG) [Entered: 12/15/2022 02:57 PM]
December 5, 2022 Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Dennis T. Kearney on behalf of Appellant(s) Acrison, Inc.. [22-3274] (DTK) [Entered: 12/05/2022 10:09 AM]
December 5, 2022 Filing 7 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Acrison Inc. [22-3274] (DTK) [Entered: 12/05/2022 08:19 AM]
December 2, 2022 Filing 6 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Acrison Inc. [22-3274] (JSF) [Entered: 12/02/2022 10:56 AM]
December 2, 2022 Filing 5 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Anthony M. Rainone. [22-3274] (JSF) [Entered: 12/02/2022 10:54 AM]
December 2, 2022 Filing 4 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Brach Eichler LLC. [22-3274] (JSF) [Entered: 12/02/2022 10:53 AM]
December 2, 2022 Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jason S. Feinstein, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) Anthony M. Rainone, John P. Martin and Brach Eichler LLC. [22-3274] (JSF) [Entered: 12/02/2022 10:52 AM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 12/01/2022 01:25 PM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Acrison Inc in District Court No. 2-22-cv-01176. (JK) [Entered: 12/01/2022 01:20 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Acrison Inc v. Anthony Rainone, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ACRISON INC
Represented By: Dennis T. Kearney Esq.
Represented By: Peter Goldberger Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANTHONY M. RAINONE, an individual
Represented By: Marshall D. Bilder Esq.
Represented By: Jason S. Feinstein Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BRACH EICHLER LLC, a New Jersey limited liability corporation
Represented By: Marshall D. Bilder Esq.
Represented By: Jason S. Feinstein Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: XCELLENCE INC, directly and as successor-in-interest to RVM ENTERPRISES, INC., DBA Xact Data Discovery
Represented By: William H. Yost Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN P. MARTIN, an individual
Represented By: Marshall D. Bilder Esq.
Represented By: Jason S. Feinstein Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?