Anna Nupson v. Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, et al
| ANNA K. NUPSON |
| SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS, LLP and BRUCE A. ROSENFIELD, Esq, |
| JOHN S. MIDDLETON, indiv. & as frmr Trustee of Trust of Frances S. Middleton as modified, frmr co-Trustee of the Trusts of Anna M. Bauer, and Executor/co-Executor of Estates of Herbert H. Middleton, Jr., and Frances S. Middleton and BRADFORD HOLDINGS INC |
| BLANK ROME LLP, Non-Party Respondent on Motion to Compel |
| 22-3401 |
| December 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 ECF FILER: Petition filed by Appellant Anna K. Nupson for Rehearing before original panel and the court en banc. Certificate of Service dated 02/17/2023. Service made by ECF. [22-3401] (PMK) [Entered: 02/17/2023 12:27 PM] |
Filing 21
ORDER (HARDIMAN, BIBAS and FREEMAN, Circuit Judges) granting Motion filed by Appellees Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis and Bruce A. Rosenfield to summarily affirm. Panel ID: ACO-032 Judge: HARDIMAN Authoring (LMR) [Entered: 02/03/2023 10:35 AM]
|
| Filing 20 ECF FILER: Reply by Appellees Bruce A. Rosenfield and Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis to. Certificate of Service dated 02/01/2023. Service made by ECF [22-3401] (DMW) [Entered: 02/01/2023 05:32 PM] |
| Filing 19 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellant Anna K. Nupson to for summary action. Certificate of Service dated 01/25/2023. [22-3401] (PMK) [Entered: 01/25/2023 05:02 PM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER (Clerk) The request to withhold issuance of the briefing schedule pending disposition of the motion for summary action is granted. The motion for summary action is referred to a motions panel. (LMR) [Entered: 01/18/2023 01:09 PM]
|
| Filing 17 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellees Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis and Bruce A. Rosenfield to summarily affirm, request that no briefing schedule be issued pending decision on this motion. Certificate of Service dated 01/17/2023. Service made by ECF. [22-3401] (DMW) [Entered: 01/17/2023 05:04 PM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER (Clerk) On January 10, 2023, the Clerk received entries of appearance from counsel for John S. Middleton, Bradford Holdings, Inc., and Blank Rome LLP, who participated in the district-court litigation. It is noted that John S. Middleton and Bradford Holdings, Inc., were granted permission to intervene in the district court for a limited purpose, but Blank Rome LLP was never formally granted leave to intervene. If these parties intend to file a brief in this appeal, they must file a single, joint brief, due on the same day as the appellees brief. Although the Clerk will accept a brief from these parties given their district-court participation, only the Court can decide the parties standing to participate in this appeal and the appropriate consideration to give the brief. If any of these parties believe that the Courts permission to intervene in this appeal is necessary, or if any other party believes that these appearances should be stricken, motions requesting such relief should be filed promptly. (LMR) [Entered: 01/17/2023 02:00 PM]
|
| Filing 15 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Justin R. Kaufman on behalf of Appellant(s) Anna Nupson. [22-3401] (JRK) [Entered: 01/11/2023 06:45 PM] |
| Filing 14 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Courtney Johnson-Vidales on behalf of Appellant(s) Anna Nupson. [22-3401] (CJ) [Entered: 01/10/2023 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Samantha B. Kats on behalf on behalf of Intervenor(s) John S. Middleton, individually and as Trustee. [22-3401] (SBK) [Entered: 01/10/2023 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Bradford Holdings, INC., intervenor. [22-3401] (WRC) [Entered: 01/10/2023 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from William R. Cruse on behalf of Intervenor(s) John S. Middleton, individually and as Trustee, Bradford Holdings, INC., and Blank Rome LLP. [22-3401] (WRC) [Entered: 01/10/2023 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Anna K. Nupson advising this court that no transcripts are available. [22-3401] (PMK) [Entered: 01/10/2023 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Anna K. Nupson. [22-3401] (PMK) [Entered: 01/10/2023 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Anna K. Nupson. [22-3401] (PMK) [Entered: 01/10/2023 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Patrick M. Harrington on behalf of Appellee(s) Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP and Bruce A. Rosenfield, Esq.. [22-3401] (PMH) [Entered: 01/05/2023 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Douglas M. Weck on behalf of Appellee(s) Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, Bruce Rosenfield, Esquire. [22-3401] (DMW) [Entered: 01/05/2023 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Timothy J. Ford on behalf of Appellee(s) Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP and Bruce A. Rosenfield, Esq.. [22-3401] (LGM) [Entered: 01/05/2023 09:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Lawrence G. McMichael on behalf of Appellee(s) Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP and Bruce A. Rosenfield, Esq.. [22-3401] (LGM) [Entered: 01/05/2023 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Philip Matthew Kovnat on behalf of Appellant(s) Anna Nupson. [22-3401] (PMK) [Entered: 12/28/2022 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 12/27/2022 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Anna K. Nupson in District Court No. 2-18-cv-02505. (LMR) [Entered: 12/27/2022 01:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
