Mustafa Ali v. Joseph Dupont, et al
MUSTAFA ALI |
JOSEPH H. DUPONT, Chief Hearing Examiner, PA Dept. of Corrections and DR. HASPER, Psychiatrist, SCI Forest |
22-3460 |
December 30, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Joseph H. Dupont to advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 01/24/2023. [22-3460] (ATK) [Entered: 01/24/2023 05:40 PM] |
Filing 6 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Cassidy L. Neal, Esq. for Hasper requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 01/31/2023. (JK) [Entered: 01/17/2023 02:07 PM] |
Filing 5 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (JW) [Entered: 01/05/2023 04:47 PM] |
Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Anthony Thomas Kovalchick on behalf of Appellee(s) Joseph H. Dupont; Michael Overmeyer; Derrick Oberlander; J.W. Sawtelle; Ian Gustafson; Dr. Bruce Simons; Kim Smith; Jamie Ferdarko; Gary Prinkey; Shirley Moore Smeal; Tabb Bickell; Jodi Sheesley. [22-3460] (ATK) [Entered: 01/05/2023 04:23 PM] |
Filing 3 ORDER (Clerk) for all parties represented by Scott A. Bradley, Esq. the designated filer shall be Joseph H. DuPont. (JK) [Entered: 12/30/2022 11:22 AM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 12/30/2022 11:19 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mustafa Ali in District Court No. 2-18-cv-00665. (JK) [Entered: 12/30/2022 11:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.