Northrop Grumman Ship Systems Inc v. The Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Venezue
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP SYSTEMS INC, f/k/a Ingalls Shoipbuilding, Inc. |
| PETROLEOS DE VENEZUELA SA and THE MINISTRY OF DEFENSE OF THE REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA |
| 22-8028 |
| May 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER The petitions for permission to appeal docketed at Nos. 22-8024, 22-8025, 22-8026, 22-8027, and 22-8028 are consolidated for disposition by the same panel. If the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Petr leos de Venezuela, S.A., PDVSA Petr leo, S.A., Corpoguanipa, S.A., or the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Venezuela oppose the judgment creditors petitions at Nos. 22-8025, 22-8026, and 22-8028, they must file a consolidated answer addressing those petitions together. If the judgment creditors oppose the Venezuela and PDVSA parties petitions at Nos. 22-8024 and 22-8027, they may file a single joint answer. If that is not practicable, they should consult with one another regarding the contents of their answers and adopt portions of other answers by reference. This Court disfavors redundant filings. [22-8024, 22-8025, 22-8026, 22-8027, 22-8028] (SB) [Entered: 05/19/2022 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 1 Petition for Permission to Appeal under 28 U.S.C. Section 1292(b) filed by Petitioner Northrop Grumman Ship Systems Inc. Received on 05/16/2022. Certificate of Service dated 05/16/2022. Service made by ECF. (SB) [Entered: 05/18/2022 02:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
