Molly Randall, et al v. Cescaphe Limtied LLC, et al
| MOLLY RANDALL, f/k/a Molly Moskowitz, MICHAEL RANDALL, PETE VARGAS, ROBERT DANIELS, MARGARET VARGAS, f/k/a Margaret "Maggie" Daniels, DEBORAH MONTI, f/k/a Deborah Monti-Daniels and MEICHELLE FEINBERG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| CESCAPHE LIMTIED LLC, DBA Cescaphe Event Group, JOSEPH VOLPRE and CESCAPHE LIMITED LLC, DBA Cescaphe Event Group |
| 23-1057 |
| January 17, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellants Robert Daniels, Meichelle Feinberg, Deborah Monti, Michael Randall, Molly Randall, Margaret Vargas and Pete Vargas. [23-1057] (LKC) [Entered: 02/15/2023 05:13 PM] |
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellants Robert Daniels, Meichelle Feinberg, Deborah Monti, Michael Randall, Molly Randall, Margaret Vargas and Pete Vargas advising this court that transcripts are not needed. [23-1057] (LKC) [Entered: 02/15/2023 05:11 PM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellants Robert Daniels, Meichelle Feinberg, Deborah Monti, Michael Randall, Molly Randall, Margaret Vargas and Pete Vargas. [23-1057] (LKC) [Entered: 02/15/2023 05:10 PM] |
| Filing 10 FOLLOW UP LETTER to L. Kenneth Chotiner, Esq. for Molly Randall, Michael Randall, Pete Vargas, Robert Daniels, Margaret Vargas, Deborah Monti and Meichelle Feinberg requesting the following document(s): Information Statement on or before 02/15/2023. Concise Summary on or before 02/15/2023. Transcript Purchase Order on or before 02/15/2023. (KR) [Entered: 02/01/2023 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellants Robert Daniels, Meichelle Feinberg, Deborah Monti, Michael Randall, Molly Randall, Margaret Vargas and Pete Vargas to Clerk Order advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 01/31/2023. [23-1057] (LKC) [Entered: 01/31/2023 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from L. Kenneth Chotiner, LL.M. on behalf of Appellant(s) Molly Randall, Michael Randall, Pete Vargas, Meichelle Feinberg, Robert Daniels, Maggie Vargas, and Deborah Monti. [23-1057] (LKC) [Entered: 01/31/2023 05:34 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: RESPONSE on behalf of Appellees Cescaphe Limited LLC and Joseph Volpre to Clerk Order advising of possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. Certificate of Service dated 01/31/2023 by ECF. [23-1057]--[Edited 01/31/2023 by KR] (BMR) [Entered: 01/31/2023 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellees Cescaphe Limtied LLC and Joseph Volpre. [23-1057] (BMR) [Entered: 01/18/2023 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Stephen J. Kastenberg on behalf of Appellee(s) Cescaphe Limited, LLC, et al. and Joseph Volpe. [23-1057] (BMR) [Entered: 01/18/2023 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Burt M. Rublin, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) Cescaphe Limited, LLC and Joseph Volpe. [23-1057] (BMR) [Entered: 01/18/2023 10:38 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (KR) [Entered: 01/17/2023 02:03 PM]
|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 01/17/2023 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Robert Daniels, Meichelle Feinberg, Deborah Monti, Michael Randall, Molly Randall, Margaret Vargas and Pete Vargas in District Court No. 2-21-cv-02806. (KR) [Entered: 01/17/2023 01:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
