Thomas Gage v. Keith Lynch, et al
| THOMAS I. GAGE |
| KEITH J. LYNCH, construction official and BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE |
| 23-1168 |
| January 26, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 APPENDIX on behalf of Appellant Mr. Thomas I. Gage. Volumes:1. Service made to counsel by Clerk's Office via CM/ECF on 03/03/2023. (TMS) [Entered: 03/03/2023 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 7 PRO SE BRIEF on behalf of Appellant Mr. Thomas I. Gage. Service made to counsel by Clerk's Office via CM/ECF on 03/03/2023. (TMS) [Entered: 03/03/2023 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Timothy P. Beck on behalf of Appellee(s) Borough of New Providence and Keith Lynch. [23-1168] (TPB) [Entered: 02/10/2023 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 5 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Timothy P. Beck, Esq. for Borough of New Providence and Keith J. Lynch requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 02/24/2023. (KR) [Entered: 02/10/2023 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Thomas I. Gage due on or before 03/13/2023. Appendix due on or before 03/13/2023. (KR) [Entered: 02/01/2023 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 3 Notice received from the district court that the docketing and filing fees were paid by the appellant on 01/26/2023. (KR) [Entered: 01/31/2023 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 01/26/2023 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Thomas I. Gage in District Court No. 2-20-cv-16236. (KR) [Entered: 01/26/2023 11:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
