Robert Fennell v. John Wetzel, et al
| ROBERT FENNELL |
| SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, JAMEY P. LUTHER, Superintendent at SCI Smithfield and HARPSTER, Correctional Officer SCI Smithfield |
| 23-1370 |
| March 8, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER (Clerk) Upon further review of the case as docketed above, it appears that appellant may be subject to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), the 'three strikes' provision of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). Accordingly, if appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal at C.A. No. 23-1370, he must either pay the appellate fees or file a motion demonstrating imminent danger of serious physical injury in support of his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, within 21 days from the date of this Order. Failure to either pay the fees or file an imminent danger motion within the time specified may result in the case being dismissed without further notice. 3rd Cir. LAR Misc. 107. If appellant does file a motion demonstrating imminent danger in support of his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, his motion and IFP application will be submitted to the next available motions panel of the Court for determination, along with the appellees response to the appellants IFP application and any reply that the appellant may file. The parties will be sent a copy of any Order(s) issued in this matter. (NF) [Entered: 05/04/2023 04:11 PM]
|
| Filing 13 MOTION filed by Appellant Robert Fennell to Extend Time to File Reply to Response for 30 days. (LMR) [Entered: 05/03/2023 10:36 AM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER (Clerk) The motion for extension of time is granted. Appellant's reply in support of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must be filed within 14 days of the date of this order. (CJG) [Entered: 04/13/2023 09:53 AM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION filed by Appellant Robert Fennell for Extension of Time to File Reply to Response. Response, if any, due on 04/20/2023. (CJG) [Entered: 04/10/2023 03:57 PM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion to proceed in forma pauperis and response are referred to a motions panel. (LMR) [Entered: 03/28/2023 10:43 AM]
|
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellees Harpster, Jamey P. Luther and John E. Wetzel to motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 03/27/2023. [23-1370] (JP) [Entered: 03/27/2023 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 8 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Robert Fennell. (LMR) [Entered: 03/27/2023 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 7 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Robert Fennell. (LMR) [Entered: 03/27/2023 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 6 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Robert Fennell. (LMR) [Entered: 03/27/2023 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Robert Fennell to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (LMR) [Entered: 03/27/2023 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jeffrey M. Paladina on behalf of Appellee(s) John E. Wetzel, Jamey P. Luther, Corrections Officer Harpster. [23-1370] (JP) [Entered: 03/24/2023 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Jeffrey Paladina, Esq. for John E. Wetzel, Jamey P. Luther and Harpster requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 04/07/2023. (LMR) [Entered: 03/24/2023 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 03/08/2023 08:22 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Robert Fennell in District Court No. 4-21-cv-01717. (LMR) [Entered: 03/08/2023 08:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
