Michael ReynoldsIn re: Michael Reynolds

Michael ReynoldsIn re: Michael Reynolds

Petitioner:	In re: MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Respondent:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number:	23-1421
Filed:	March 10, 2023
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
March 10, 2023	Filing 2 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Mr. Michael Curtis Reynolds requesting within 21 days of the date of this order: (1) a memorandum, not exceeding 20 pages, which clearly states how the standards of section 2244(b) are satisfied; (2) the new proposed motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255; (3) the prior 2255 motion(s) filed in M.D. Pa. No. 3-05-cr-00493-001; and (4) the district court opinion(s) and/or order(s) regarding the prior 2255 motions in M.D. Pa. No. 3-05-cr-00493-001. Petitioner must also file a certificate of service with the Clerk of the Court of Appeals demonstrating that these documents have been served. Respondent may file a response within seven (7) days of the filing of Petitioner's completed application. [-See Order for Full Text.] (CJG) [Entered: 03/10/2023 10:50 AM]
March 10, 2023	Filing 1 Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(b) filed. Notice filed by Petitioner Mr. Michael Curtis Reynolds. Placed in Prison Mail on 03/01/2023. Received in the Court of Appeals on 03/06/2023. (CJG) [Entered: 03/10/2023 10:40 AM]

Date Filed

Document Text

March 10, 2023

Filing 2 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Mr. Michael Curtis Reynolds requesting within 21 days of the date of this order: (1) a memorandum, not exceeding 20 pages, which clearly states how the standards of section 2244(b) are satisfied; (2) the new proposed motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255; (3) the prior 2255 motion(s) filed in M.D. Pa. No. 3-05-cr-00493-001; and (4) the district court opinion(s) and/or order(s) regarding the prior 2255 motions in M.D. Pa. No. 3-05-cr-00493-001. Petitioner must also file a certificate of service with the Clerk of the Court of Appeals demonstrating that these documents have been served. Respondent may file a response within seven (7) days of the filing of Petitioner's completed application. [-See Order for Full Text.] (CJG) [Entered: 03/10/2023 10:50 AM]

March 10, 2023

Filing 1 Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(b) filed. Notice filed by Petitioner Mr. Michael Curtis Reynolds. Placed in Prison Mail on 03/01/2023. Received in the Court of Appeals on 03/06/2023. (CJG) [Entered: 03/10/2023 10:40 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael ReynoldsIn re: Michael Reynolds
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Represented By:	Michael Curtis Reynolds
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By:	Navin Jani Esq.
Represented By:	Carlo D. Marchioli Esq.
Represented By:	Joseph J. Terz Esq.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?