John Williams v. Wetzel, et al
| JOHN W. WILLIAMS |
| JOHN E. WETZEL, THOMAS PLACEY, COMMON PLEAS JUDGE, EDWARD E. GUIDO, PRESIDENT JUDGE, RHONDA J. SMITH, COURT REPORTER, DENIS LEBO, CLERK OF THE COURT, MERLE L. EBERT, CLERK OF THE COURT, KIMBERLY A. METZGER, ASSISTANT DISSTRICT ATTORNEY,CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, (MIDDLE DISTRICT) and MICHELE A. ELINE, COURT REPORTER |
| 23-1562 |
| April 3, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION filed by Appellant John W. Williams to Extend Time to File "Argument in Support of Appeal" in Response to 04/25/2023 Clerk Order. Response due on 05/30/2023. Certificate of Service dated 05/14/2023. Service made by US mail. (AMR) [Entered: 05/22/2023 10:57 AM] |
Filing 9
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Appellant is a prisoner and seeks to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Appellant is required to pay the full $505.00 fee in installments regardless of the outcome of the appeal. 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 (b). The Court hereby directs the warden or his or her designee to assess an initial filing fee, when funds are available, of 20% of the greater of (a) the average monthly deposits to the prisoners account; or (b) the average monthly balance in the prisoners account for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the notice of appeal. The appeal will be submitted to a panel of this court for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) as to whether the appeal will be dismissed as legally frivolous or whether summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 is appropriate. In making this determination, the district court opinion and record will be examined. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. Appellee need not file a response unless directed to do so. [Please open the attachment for the full text of the Order] (AMR) [Entered: 04/25/2023 02:52 PM]
|
| Filing 8 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant John W. Williams. (AMR) [Entered: 04/24/2023 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 7 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant John W. Williams. (AMR) [Entered: 04/18/2023 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 6 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant John W. Williams. (AMR) [Entered: 04/18/2023 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant John W. Williams to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 04/28/2023. Clerk's office made service on 04/18/2023. Service made by ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 04/18/2023 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Daniel B. Mullen on behalf of Appellee(s) John E. Wetzel; Tom Wolf; George Little; Tomothy A. Holmes; Debra Sue Rand; Barry Smith; Rebecca Reifer; Melissa Straw; Susan Hnatkovich; Robert Westover; Brodie Urban; Robert Parkt; T. Little; B. Civiello; CO Stewart (see attached for additional parties). [23-1562] (DBM) [Entered: 04/14/2023 04:41 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) for all parties represented by Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General, Esq. the designated filer shall be John Wetzel. (AMR) [Entered: 04/03/2023 01:06 PM]
|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 04/03/2023 01:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant John W. Williams in District Court No. 3-20-cv-00061. (AMR) [Entered: 04/03/2023 12:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
