Isaac Usoroh v. Todd Koger, Sr., et al
ISAAC USOROH |
TODD ELLIOTT KOGER, SR. |
TODD ELLIOTT KOGER, JR. |
23-1632 |
April 6, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other Real Property Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER (Clerk) No action will be taken on the motion as it is unnecessary. It is noted that the District Court previously granted Appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and there were no proceedings held in the District Court that would need transcribed for the appeal. (CJG) [Entered: 04/24/2023 10:17 AM] |
Filing 6 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Isaac Usoroh to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 04/20/2023. [23-1632] (GAS) [Entered: 04/20/2023 02:56 PM] |
Filing 5 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 04/11/2023 11:55 AM] |
Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Gusty A. E. Sunseri, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) Isaac Usoroh. [23-1632] (GAS) [Entered: 04/07/2023 11:25 AM] |
Filing 3 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 04/06/2023 02:52 PM] |
Filing 2 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Todd Elliott Koger, Sr. to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Request for Payment of Any and All Transcripts. Certificate of Service dated 03/30/2023. Service made by Email. (CJG) [Entered: 04/06/2023 02:51 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Todd Elliott Koger, Sr. in District Court No. 2-22-cv-01823. (CJG) [Entered: 04/06/2023 02:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.