Lee Evans v. Newark City, et al
| LEE EVANS |
| CITY OF NEWARK, FORMER MAYOR COREY A. BOOKER, OFFICER JOE HADLEY, DETECTIVE RASHID SABUR, DETECTIVE KEITH SHEPPARD, SGT. DARNELL HENRY, DETECTIVE JOSEPH HADLEY, OFFICER ANGEL RAMOS, FORMER, NEWARK POLICE DIRECTOR GARRY MCCARTHY, ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, ROBERT D. LAURINO, former acting Essex County Prosecutor, ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR PETER GUARINO, ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR CHERYL M. CUCINELLO, DETECTIVE CHRISTOPHER SMITH, LIEUTENANT LOU CARREGA, AGENT JACK EUTSEY, DETECTIVE MICHAEL M. RECKENWALD, INVESTIGATOR EDWARD JONES, INVESTIGATOR PATRICK DEFRANCISCI and NEW JERSEY STATE TROOPER 1-10 |
| DETECTIVE SGT. WILLIAM TIETJEN |
| 23-1724 |
| April 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jae K. Shim, Deputy Attorney General on behalf of Appellee(s) Lou Carrega. [23-1724] (JKS) [Entered: 06/09/2023 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 20 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Jae K. Shim, Esq. for Lou Carrega requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form within 14 days. (TMM) [Entered: 06/08/2023 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 18 FOLLOW UP LETTER to John M. Bowens, Esq. for Robert D. Laurino, Christopher Smith, Essex County Prosecutors Office, Peter Guarino, Cheryl M. Cucinello, Jack Eutsey, Michael M. Reckenwald, Edward Jones and Patrick Defrancisci requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form within 14 days. (TMM) [Entered: 05/25/2023 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 17 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Gary S. Lipshutz, Esq. for Rashid Sabur, City of Newark, Garry McCarthy, Corey A. Booker, Joe Hadley, Keith Sheppard, Darnell Henry, Joseph Hadley and Angel Ramos requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form within 14 days. (TMM) [Entered: 05/25/2023 09:31 AM] |
Filing 16
ORDER (Clerk) The Clerk will not submit the appeal for dismissal at this time. All responses filed by the parties regarding the jurisdictional issue are referred to the merits panel. This does not in any way signify that a determination of jurisdiction has been made. Only the Court can make such a decision. The parties are directed to address this Court's jurisdiction in their briefs. [23-1723, 23-1724] (TMM) [Entered: 05/25/2023 08:59 AM]
|
| Filing 15 ECF FILER: CORRECTED Response filed by Appellee Lee Evans. Certificate of Service dated 05/11/2023. [23-1723, 23-1724]--[Edited 05/11/2023 by TMM] (JAB) [Entered: 05/11/2023 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 14 ECF FILER: LETTER Response filed by Appellee Lee Evans concerning this Court's Jurisdiction over Appellant Hadley's Appeal. Certificate of Service dated 05/05/2023. [23-1723, 23-1724] SEND TO MERITS PANEL.--[Edited 05/25/2023 by TMM] (JAB) [Entered: 05/05/2023 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Lee Evans to Clerk's Order advising of possible dismissal . Certificate of Service dated 05/05/2023. [23-1723, 23-1724] SEND TO MERITS PANEL.--[Edited 05/25/2023 by TMM] (JAB) [Entered: 05/05/2023 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jennifer Bonjean on behalf of Appellee(s) Lee Evans. [23-1723, 23-1724] (JAB) [Entered: 05/05/2023 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellant Lou Carrega in 23-1723, Appellee Lou Carrega in 23-1724 to clerk order advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 05/03/2023. [23-1723, 23-1724] SEND TO MERITS PANEL.--[Edited 05/25/2023 by TMM] (JKS) [Entered: 05/03/2023 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant William Tietjen advising this court that transcripts are not needed. [23-1724] (PJM) [Entered: 05/03/2023 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant William Tietjen. [23-1724] (PJM) [Entered: 05/03/2023 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant William Tietjen. [23-1724] (PJM) [Entered: 05/03/2023 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Patrick J. Misale on behalf of Appellant(s) William Tietjen. [23-1724] (PJM) [Entered: 05/03/2023 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: LETTER RESPONSE filed by Appellee Joseph Hadley to Clerk's Order dated April 21, 2023. Certificate of Service dated 04/23/2023. Service made by ECF. [23-1723, 23-1724] SEND TO MERITS PANEL.--[Edited 05/25/2023 by TMM] (GSL) [Entered: 04/23/2023 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Gary S. Lipshutz, First Assistant Corporation Counsel on behalf of Appellee(s) Joseph Hadley. [23-1723, 23-1724] (GSL) [Entered: 04/23/2023 10:16 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) Appellants seek review of the District Court order entered March 16, 2023. The order on appeal is not final within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. Section 1291 and is not otherwise appealable at this time. Compare Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 530 (1985), with Johnson v. Jones, 515 U.S. 304, 319-20 (1995), and Monteirp v. City of Elizabeth, 436 F. 3d 397, 405 (3d Cir. 2006); see also Barton v. Curtis, 497 F. 3d. 331, 336 (3d Cir. 2007); Doe v. Groody, 361 F. 3d 232, 237-38 (3rd Cir. 2004); In re Montgomery County, 215 F.3d 367, 373-74 (3d Cir. 2000). All parties must file written responses addressing this issue, with a certificate of service attached, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. The appeals at Nos. 23-1723 and 23-1724 are hereby consolidated for purposes of scheduling, joint appendix, Appellee Evans' brief, and disposition, should a briefing schedule issue in these cases. If a briefing schedule issues in these cases, Appellants are encouraged to consult with one another regarding the contents of their briefs as the Court disfavors repetitive briefs. Appellants may file a consolidated brief or join in or adopt portions by reference. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(i). It is noted that Appellees' briefs must be filed and served within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the last Appellant's brief. The parties are hereby directed to electronically file documents on the Court's docket as follows: Appellant: All case opening forms, motions, and briefs must be filed only in the appeal number assigned to the filer's notice of appeal. If a document is being filed jointly by multiple appellants, the document must be filed only in the appeal numbers assigned to the filing appellants. Appellees: All case opening forms must be filed in all appeals in which the appellee intends to participate. All motions should be filed only in those cases for which the relief is being requested. All responsive briefs should be filed only in the appeal to which the appellee is responding. If the appellee is filing a consolidated response brief, the brief must be filed in all appeals to which the appellee is responding. The consolidated joint appendix must be filed in all appeal numbers. The parties are advised that case opening forms for later filed appeals must only be filed in the new appeals and not re-filed in earlier appeals in which the forms were previously filed. The parties are further advised that failure to file documents in the appropriate case may result in the issuance of a noncompliance order. [23-1723, 23-1724] (TMM) [Entered: 04/21/2023 10:35 AM]
|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMM) [Entered: 04/21/2023 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant William Tietjen in District Court No. 2-14-cv-00120. (TMM) [Entered: 04/21/2023 09:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
