Rahul Telang, et al v. NVR Inc
RAHUL TELANG and ASHWINI GANDHE, husband and wife |
NVR INC, trading and doing business as NVR, Inc. |
23-1803 |
April 28, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellants Ashwini Gandhe and Rahul Telang advising this court that no transcripts are available. [23-1803] (JMG) [Entered: 06/01/2023 03:20 PM] |
Filing 14 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellants Ashwini Gandhe and Rahul Telang. [23-1803] (JMG) [Entered: 06/01/2023 03:18 PM] |
Filing 13 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Jonathan M. Gesk, Esq. and Brendan B. Lupetin, Esq. for Rahul Telang and Ashwini Gandhe requesting the following document(s): Concise Summary on or before 06/13/2023. Transcript Purchase Order on or before 06/13/2023. (TMM) [Entered: 05/30/2023 04:03 PM] |
Filing 12 Attorney Bar status modified for Jaynee LaVecchia, Esq. for NVR Inc. Status is now active. (TMK) [Entered: 05/24/2023 12:08 PM] |
Filing 11 NOTICE REGARDING ATTORNEY STATUS for APPEARANCE FORM filed by Attorney Jaynee LaVecchia, Esq. for Appellee NVR Inc. Counsel's current status in this Court's attorney rolls is inactive. An attorney must have active status in order to appear before this Court. R.A.D.E. 17.3. If you wish to return to active status or if you believe that you have been marked inactive in error, please complete the Attorney Admission Renewal/Adjustment of Status Form available on this Court's website by 05/30/2023. Future filings will not be accepted from an attorney in inactive status. (TMK) [Entered: 05/16/2023 08:49 AM] |
Filing 10 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from David R. Kott on behalf of Appellee(s) NVR, Inc., d/b/a Ryan Homes. [23-1803] (DRK) [Entered: 05/12/2023 02:22 PM] |
Filing 9 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee NVR Inc. [23-1803] (JL) [Entered: 05/12/2023 02:17 PM] |
Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Justine Jaynee LaVecchia (Ret.) on behalf of Appellee(s) NVR, Inc., d/b/a Ryan Homes. [23-1803] (JL) [Entered: 05/12/2023 02:12 PM] |
Filing 7 Attorney Bar status modified for Brendan B. Lupetin, Esq. for Rahul Telang and Ashwini Gandhe. Status is now active. (TMK) [Entered: 05/12/2023 08:23 AM] |
Filing 6 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellants Rahul Telang and Ashwini Gandhe. [23-1803] (JMG) [Entered: 05/10/2023 12:19 PM] |
Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jonathan Gesk on behalf of Appellant(s) Rahul Telang and Ashwini Gandhe. [23-1803] (JMG) [Entered: 05/10/2023 12:17 PM] |
Filing 4 NOTICE REGARDING ATTORNEY STATUS for APPEARANCE FORM filed by Attorney Brendan B. Lupetin, Esq. for Appellants Rahul Telang and Ashwini Gandhe. Counsel's current status in this Court's attorney rolls is inactive. An attorney must have active status in order to appear before this Court. R.A.D.E. 17.3. If you wish to return to active status or if you believe that you have been marked inactive in error, please complete the Attorney Admission Renewal/Adjustment of Status Form available on this Court's website by 05/24/2023. Future filings will not be accepted from an attorney in inactive status. (TMK) [Entered: 05/10/2023 11:50 AM] |
Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Brendan B. Lupetin on behalf of Appellant(s) Rahul Telang and Ashwini Gandhe. [23-1803] (BBL) [Entered: 05/09/2023 11:34 AM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMM) [Entered: 04/28/2023 10:28 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Ashwini Gandhe and Rahul Telang in District Court No. 2-19-cv-01025. (TMM) [Entered: 04/28/2023 10:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.