Malikul Aziz, et al v. City of Newark
Plaintiff / Appellant: MALIKUL AZIZ, RONNIE CRUZ and RUDAN RAMSAHAI
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF NEWARK
Case Number: 23-2006
Filed: June 2, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2023 Filing 5 FOLLOW UP LETTER to John C. Luke, Jr., Esq. and Adam P. Slater, Esq. for Malikul Aziz, Ronnie Cruz and Rudan Ramsahai requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form within 14 days. Information Statement on or before 07/20/2023. Concise Summary on or before 07/20/2023. Transcript Purchase Order on or before 07/20/2023. (TMM) [Entered: 07/06/2023 04:23 PM]
June 16, 2023 Filing 4 ECF FILER: Response to Third Circuit Order dated June 2, 2023 filed by Appellee City of Newark. Certificate of Service dated 06/16/2023. Service made by ECF. [23-2006] (CRS) [Entered: 06/16/2023 03:29 PM]
June 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER (Clerk) In this Fair Labor Standards Act collective action. "Plaintiffs" have appealed an order granting summary judgment on 79 opt-in plaintiffs' claims. Other claims remain pending in the district court. There may therefore not yet be an appealable "final decision[] under 28 U.S.C. Section 1291. All parties must file written responses addressing this issue within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. Their responses should also address whether the notice of appeal filed by "Plaintiffs" adequately specifies the appellants, see Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(A), and whether the specified appellants have standing to challenge the decision on the 79 opt-in plaintiffs' claims, cf Halle v. W. Penn Allegheny Health Sys. Inc., 842 F. 3d 215 (3d Cir. 2016). (TMM) [Entered: 06/02/2023 11:35 AM]
June 2, 2023 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMM) [Entered: 06/02/2023 11:21 AM]
June 2, 2023 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Malikul Aziz, Ronnie Cruz and Rudan Ramsahai in District Court No. 2-20-cv-10309. (TMM) [Entered: 06/02/2023 11:16 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Malikul Aziz, et al v. City of Newark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MALIKUL AZIZ
Represented By: John C. Luke Esq. Jr.
Represented By: Adam P. Slater Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RONNIE CRUZ
Represented By: Adam P. Slater Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RUDAN RAMSAHAI
Represented By: Adam P. Slater Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF NEWARK
Represented By: Sean P. Carey Esq.
Represented By: Cheyne R. Scott Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?