Amir Smith v. John Gehrs, IV, et al
AMIR MARQUI SMITH |
JOHN A. GEHRS, IV and TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL |
23-2137 |
June 26, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Civil Rights Employment |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1(a), for failure to pay the filing fee for the notice of appeal. Case terminated on 07/25/2023. (ARR) [Entered: 07/25/2023 11:17 AM] |
Filing 7 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellees John A. Gehrs, IV and Temple University Hospital to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction. Certificate of Service dated 07/18/2023. Service made by US mail, Email. [23-2137] (DKR) [Entered: 07/18/2023 10:05 AM] |
Filing 6 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Temple University Hospital. [23-2137] (DKR) [Entered: 06/28/2023 11:33 AM] |
Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Angela L. Velez on behalf of Appellee(s) Temple University Hospital, John A. Gehrs, IV. [23-2137] (ALV) [Entered: 06/27/2023 04:41 PM] |
Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (NF) [Entered: 06/27/2023 04:22 PM] |
Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Douglas K. Rosenblum on behalf of Appellee(s) Temple University Hospital, John A. Gehrs, IV. [23-2137] (DKR) [Entered: 06/27/2023 03:40 PM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (ARR) [Entered: 06/26/2023 05:16 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Amir Marqui Smith in District Court No. 2-21-cv-03946. (ARR) [Entered: 06/26/2023 05:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.