Sean JelenIn re: Sean Jelen
Petitioner: In re: SEAN E. JELEN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MALACHY E. MANNION
Case Number: 23-2211
Filed: July 7, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2023 Filing 2 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Sean E. Jelen. On July 2, 2023, the Court received a document from Petitioner titled "Notice and Motion," which has been construed as a petition for writ of mandamus. So construed, action on the petition is hereby deferred. Petitioner did not submit the filing fee or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the petition. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, Petitioner must either file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit or remit payment of the $500.00 filing fee. A form affidavit is enclosed for Petitioner's convenience. It is noted that a petition for writ of mandamus is an original action and a separate motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must be filed, regardless of Petitioner's fee status in other proceedings. If the filing fee is not paid or the motion is not filed, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 107.1. Petitioner must also serve the petition on each party to the proceeding in the trial court (or on counsel for each party), and provide a copy of the petition for writ of mandamus to the District Court judge. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(1). In addition, a copy of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must be served on each party to the proceeding, to include the District Court judge. This Court does not provide service for litigants, even those who are found to be indigent. A certificate of service reflecting that the petition and motion have been served must be submitted to the Court of Appeals within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 21 and 25. The petition will not be submitted to the Court until the filing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis, affidavit, and certificate of service are received. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(3). (TMM) [Entered: 07/07/2023 03:30 PM]
July 7, 2023 Filing 1 Submission from Petitioner Sean E. Jelen titled "Notice and Motion, "treated as Petition for Writ of Mandamus.--[Edited 07/07/2023 by TMM] (TMM) [Entered: 07/07/2023 03:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sean JelenIn re: Sean Jelen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: SEAN E. JELEN
Represented By: Sean E. Jelen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Sean A. Camoni Esq.
Represented By: Phillip J. Caraballo-Garrison Esq.
Represented By: Jenny P. Roberts Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MALACHY E. MANNION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?