Michael Washington v. , et alIn re: Michael Washington v. , et al
| In re: MICHAEL T. WASHINGTON |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE, WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and COLM F. CONNOLLY |
| 23-2269 |
| July 14, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (TMM) [Entered: 07/14/2023 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 3 NONCOMPLIANCE Order Action on the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is deferred pending submission of an additional document. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Petitioner must file a certified statement of Petitioner's institutional account statement for the six months prior to this date. If the certified account statement is not filed, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 107.1. The petition will not be submitted to the Court until the certified account statement is received. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(3). (TMM) [Entered: 07/14/2023 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Michael T. Washington to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 07/04/2023. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 07/14/2023 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Michael T. Washington. (TMM) [Entered: 07/14/2023 02:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
