Meenaxi Enterprise Inc v. Singh Trading Co Inc, et al
| SINGH TRADING CO INC, DBA Roshni Foods, PARDEEP SINGH ANEJ, BHAVANI FOODS AND VEGETABLES INC, MUKUND PATEL, HOUSE OF SPICES INDIA INC, NEIL SONI, DK GROCERY INC, DBA Apna Bazar Cash & Carry and KHADAG SINGH |
| MEENAXI ENTERPRISE |
| VDYAS LLC, CHARANDEEP SINGH, JMR DISTRIBUTORS LLC, HIRAL JOSHI, HETAL MEHTA, PEEKAY INTERNATIONAL INC and BINOTI PARMAR |
| 23-2288 |
| July 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Trademark |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Meenaxi Enterprise advising this court that no transcripts are available. [23-2288] (RSM) [Entered: 08/08/2023 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 11 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Richard S. Mandel, Esq. for Meenaxi Enterprise requesting Transcript Purchase Order on or before 08/21/2023. (CJG) [Entered: 08/07/2023 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 10 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Mark J. Ingber, Esq. for VDYAS LLC, Charandeep Singh, Peekay International Inc and Binoti Parmar and Firouzeh Nur-Vaccaro, Esq. for JMR Distributors LLC, Hiral Joshi and Hetal Mehta requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form and Disclosure Statement on or before 08/21/2023. If we do not received your forms by the deadline it will be presumed that you will not be participating in the appeal and you will receive no futher notifications. (CJG) [Entered: 08/07/2023 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellant Meenaxi Enterprise to Explaining Basis for Appellate Jurisdiction. Certificate of Service dated 08/01/2023. [23-2288]--[Edited 08/01/2023 by CJG] (RSM) [Entered: 08/01/2023 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Meenaxi Enterprise. [23-2288] (RSM) [Entered: 07/20/2023 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Meenaxi Enterprise. [23-2288] (RSM) [Entered: 07/20/2023 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Meenaxi Enterprise. [23-2288] (RSM) [Entered: 07/20/2023 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Richard S. Mandel on behalf of Appellant(s) Meenaxi Enterprise, Inc.. [23-2288] (RSM) [Entered: 07/20/2023 03:02 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) Appellant seeks review of the District Court's orders entered June 21, 2023 and July 6, 2023, denying motions for default judgment and a motion for reconsideration. The orders appealed may not be final within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. Section 1291 and may not otherwise be appealable at this time. All parties must file written responses addressing this Court's authority over the appeal, with a certificate of service attached, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. The parties should specifically address whether the orders are, in fact, denials of a permanent injunction and therefore immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. Section: 1292(a)(1). (CJG) [Entered: 07/19/2023 04:40 PM]
|
| Filing 3 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 07/19/2023 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (CJG) [Entered: 07/19/2023 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Meenaxi Enterprise Inc in District Court No. 2-23-cv-00906. (CJG) [Entered: 07/19/2023 04:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
