Paul Pieczynski v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
| PAUL E. PIECZYNSKI |
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STEPHANIE J. SALAVANTIS, Acting District Attorney, MICHAEL T. VOUGH, Acting Judge and DAVID W. LUPAS |
| 23-2329 |
| July 25, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Arbitration |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Paul Pieczynski v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE Opposition on behalf of Appellant Paul E. Pieczynski to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal [ # 4 ]. Certificate of Service dated 09/18/2023. Service made by ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 09/18/2023 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice received from the district court that the docketing and filing fees were paid by the appellant on 08/08/2023. (PDB) [Entered: 08/09/2023 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (SH) [Entered: 07/27/2023 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (PDB) [Entered: 07/25/2023 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 07/25/2023 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Paul E. Pieczynski in District Court No. 3-22-cv-02037. (PDB) [Entered: 07/25/2023 10:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
