David Fitzgerald v. National Railroad Passenger Corp
DAVID FITZGERALD |
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP, (AMTRAK) |
23-2340 |
July 28, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Civil Rights Employment |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
David Fitzgerald v. National Railroad Passenger Corp |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER (Clerk) denying motion for extension of time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant David Fitzgerald as presented. Appellant's brief and appendix must be filed and served on or before September 25, 2023. If more time is required, a renewed motion showing forth good cause may be filed. (JK) [Entered: 09/07/2023 10:26 AM] |
Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant David Fitzgerald for a 30 Day Extension of Time to File Brief and Appendix. (JK) [Entered: 08/29/2023 09:36 AM] |
Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Kimberly Saginario on behalf of Appellee(s) National Railroad Passenger Corp. [23-2340] (KDS) [Entered: 08/24/2023 12:31 PM] |
Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Nina K. Markey on behalf of Appellee(s) National Railroad Passenger Corp. [23-2340] (NKM) [Entered: 08/17/2023 09:49 AM] |
Filing 6 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Nina K. Markey, Esq. for National Railroad Passenger Corp and Kimberly D. Saginario, Esq. for National Railroad Passenger Corp requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 08/28/2023. (JK) [Entered: 08/14/2023 12:56 PM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (JK) [Entered: 07/31/2023 12:02 PM] |
Filing 4 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant David Fitzgerald due on or before 09/11/2023. Appendix due on or before 09/11/2023. (JK) [Entered: 07/31/2023 11:59 AM] |
Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (JK) [Entered: 07/28/2023 04:26 PM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 07/28/2023 04:25 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant David Fitzgerald in District Court No. 2-21-cv-05355. (JK) [Entered: 07/28/2023 04:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: David Fitzgerald v. National Railroad Passenger Corp | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: DAVID FITZGERALD | |
Represented By: | David Fitzgerald |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP, (AMTRAK) | |
Represented By: | Nina K. Markey Esq. |
Represented By: | Kimberly D. Saginario Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.