Karen Tucker v. Marc Simon, et al
| KAREN TUCKER |
| MARC I. SIMON, Esq., SIMON & SIMON PC, ZACK WILDSMITH, ERIC NEIMAN, CHRISTOPHER GREEN and DANIEL WARD |
| 23-2465 |
| August 18, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER (Clerk) This appeal is currently stayed under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4) because the appellant filed a motion for reconsideration in the district court. The stay will automatically expire when the district court disposes of the reconsideration motion. A party intending to challenge the order disposing of the reconsideration motion must file a notice of appeal or an amended notice of appeal. During the stay, the appellant submitted her brief for this appeal. Further briefing is stayed until the district court decides the reconsideration motion. If the district court denies reconsideration and the appellant files a timely amended notice of appeal, the appellant must notify this Court whether she wants to file a supplemental brief addressing the denial of reconsideration. Her notification must be filed in this Court within seven days after she files her amended notice of appeal. Unless the appellant will be filing a supplemental brief, the appellees response brief must be filed and served within sixty days after the district court disposes of the reconsideration motion. (SB) [Entered: 10/03/2023 02:11 PM]
|
| Filing 10 EXHIBIT(S) [flash drive] on behalf of Appellant Ms. Karen Tucker. Copies: 3. Recieved on 9/18/2023. (GPK) [Entered: 09/26/2023 10:22 AM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER (Clerk) Appellants Motion for a Stay or Injunction Pending Appeal Brief Schedule and 8.2 Expedited Motion to Stay Pending Judge Robert Kugler Decision to Correct and Vacate Order appears to request that this appeal be stayed until the district court adjudicates the appellants pending reconsideration motion. Because the Clerks August 24, 2023, order already granted that relief, no further action will be taken on the appellants motion (SB) [Entered: 09/20/2023 02:56 PM]
|
| Filing 9 INFORMAL BRIEF with Appendix attached on behalf of Appellant Ms. Karen Tucker. Pages: 30. Certificate of Service dated 09/15/2023 by US mail. (SJB) [Entered: 09/20/2023 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Karen Tucker Motion for Leave to File Exhibits on Flash Drives. Response due on 09/28/2023. Certificate of Service dated 09/15/2023. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 09/20/2023 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ORDER - RULE 4(a)(4) staying case pending disposition of post decision motion(s). (SB) [Entered: 08/24/2023 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert S. Tintner, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) Simon & Simon, P.C., Marc I. Simon, Eric Neiman, Daniel Ward, Christopher Green, Zack Wildsmith. [23-2465] (RST) [Entered: 08/22/2023 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Karen Tucker to Stayor Injunction Pending Appeal. Response due on 09/05/2023. Certificate of Service dated 08/22/2023. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 08/31/2023 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (KR) [Entered: 08/18/2023 08:07 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 08/18/2023 08:05 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Ms. Karen Tucker in District Court No. 1-21-cv-15357. (KR) [Entered: 08/18/2023 07:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
