USA v. Keith Dougherty
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| KEITH DOUGHERTY |
| 23-2735 |
| September 27, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) Accordingly, Appellant may elect to either waive counsel and proceed pro se on appeal or accept representation by the Federal Public Defender. Appellant must make his election known to the Clerk by filing the waiver of counsel form or by filing a written statement accepting representation by the Federal Public Defender within 14 days of the date of this order. The Federal Public Defender has been appointed as counsel for Appellant until such time as Appellant informs the Clerk of his choice. In the event Appellant fails to respond to this Order, it will be presumed that Appellant has chosen to be represented by the Federal Public Defender. Answer due 10/11/2023. (DW) [Entered: 09/27/2023 04:13 PM]
|
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) appointing FPD to represent Appellant Mr. Keith Dougherty. (DW) [Entered: 09/27/2023 03:56 PM]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1. (DW) [Entered: 09/27/2023 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (DW) [Entered: 09/27/2023 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Mr. Keith Dougherty in District Court No. 1-19-cr-00140-001. (DW) [Entered: 09/27/2023 03:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.