Marcellus Washington v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office/General, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARCELLUS WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee: GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Case Number: 23-3083
Filed: November 22, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2023 Filing 11 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Marcellus Washington to Reverse District Court Order dated 10/18/23 and a Response to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal. (LMR) [Entered: 12/22/2023 10:11 AM]
December 20, 2023 Filing 10 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Mr. Marcellus Washington. (LMR) [Entered: 12/22/2023 10:07 AM]
December 20, 2023 Filing 9 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Mr. Marcellus Washington. (LMR) [Entered: 12/22/2023 10:07 AM]
December 20, 2023 Filing 8 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Mr. Marcellus Washington. (LMR) [Entered: 12/22/2023 10:06 AM]
December 20, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Marcellus Washington to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (LMR) [Entered: 12/22/2023 10:06 AM]
November 28, 2023 Filing 6 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 11/28/2023 02:54 PM]
November 27, 2023 Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Patrick J. Bannon on behalf of Appellee(s) Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office/General Counsel et al. [23-3083] (PJB) [Entered: 11/27/2023 10:31 AM]
November 22, 2023 Filing 4 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 11/22/2023 04:39 PM]
November 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER (Clerk) For all parties represented by Ryann D. Loftus, Esq., or any other attorney from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, the designated filer shall be the Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office/General Counsel. (CJG) [Entered: 11/22/2023 04:38 PM]
November 22, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (CJG) [Entered: 11/22/2023 04:37 PM]
November 22, 2023 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Marcellus Washington in District Court No. 3-23-cv-00515. (CJG) [Entered: 11/22/2023 04:33 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Marcellus Washington v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office/General, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MARCELLUS WASHINGTON
Represented By: Marcellus Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Represented By: Ryann Loftus
Represented By: Patrick J. Bannon Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?