Mark Brentley, Jr. v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
| MARK BRENTLEY, JR. |
| CITY OF PITTSBURGH, MIKE GABLE, WILLIAM PEDUTO, TYRONE CLARK, CYNTHIA N. MCCORMICK and LINDA JOHNSON-WASLER |
| 23-3203 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Hillary M. Weaver, Esquire, Assistant City Solicitor on behalf of Appellee(s) City of Pittsburgh; Mike Gable, William Peduto, Tyrone Clark, Linda Johnson-Wasler. [23-3203] (HW) [Entered: 02/06/2024 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Mark Brentley Jr. due on or before 03/18/2024. Appendix due on or before 03/18/2024. (JK) [Entered: 02/06/2024 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Julie E. Koren, Associate City Solicitor on behalf of Appellee(s) City of Pittsburgh, Mike Gable, William Peduto, Tyrone Clark, Linda Johnson-Wasler. [23-3203] (JEK) [Entered: 01/04/2024 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (JK) [Entered: 12/21/2023 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 12/21/2023 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mark Brentley, Jr. in District Court No. 2-20-cv-00489. (JK) [Entered: 12/21/2023 10:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
