Urve Maggitti v. William Mahon, et al
| URVE MAGGITTI |
| WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND, AMY DREIBELBIS, MATHIEU SHAPIRO, THOMAS A. LEONARD, MELISSA BLANCO, ENRICO PAGANELLI, WILLIAM C. WENNER, NANCY L. CLEMENS, JAMES MCCLOSKEY, RENEE C. JUBELIRER, MICHAEL BRUNELLE, SCOTT B. COOPER, THOMAS J. FARRELL, Esq., LAURA K. MOHNEY, JERRY M. LEHOCKY, JAMES M. FOX, JANA M. PALKO, STEVEN PARKINSON, WILLIAM JUDGE, CHRISTINE L. DONOHUE, KEVIN M. DOUGHERTY, DAVID N. WECHT, SALLIE UPDYKE MUNDY and P. KEVIN BROBSON |
| 23-3275 |
| December 29, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ECF FILER: STATUS REPORT received from Appellant Urve Maggitti. Certificate of Service dated 02/08/2024. Service made by Email. [23-3275] (UM) [Entered: 02/08/2024 12:51 AM] |
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Joseph F. Kampherstein, III on behalf of Appellee(s) Deborah Ryan, Daniel Roland & William Judge. [23-3275] (JFK) [Entered: 01/30/2024 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Michael B. Pullano on behalf of Appellee(s) Deborah Ryan, Daniel Roland & William Judge. [23-3275] (MBP) [Entered: 01/30/2024 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellant Urve Maggitti in Opposition to Dismissal of the Appeal of Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction. Certificate of Service dated 01/28/2024. Service made by ECF, Email. [23-3275]--[Edited 01/29/2024 by CJG] (UM) [Entered: 01/28/2024 07:23 PM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Michael P. Daley (23-3277 - Brett M. Binder) on behalf of Appellee(s) All Judicial Defendants listed in each matter... [23-3275, 23-3274, 23-3276, 23-3277] (MD) [Entered: 01/11/2024 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 8 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (ZM) [Entered: 01/09/2024 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellees Melissa Blanco, Hillary J. Moonay, Thomas A. Leonard, David A. Nasatir, Nicholas Poduslenko, Mathieu Shapiro and David Ladov in 23-3277, Appellees Melissa Blanco, Hillary J. Moonay, David A. Nasatir, Nicholas Poduslenko and Mathieu Shapiro in 23-3276. [23-3277, 23-3276, 23-3275] (MB) [Entered: 01/05/2024 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Melissa M. Blanco on behalf of Appellee(s) Hillary J. Moonay, David A. Nasatir, Mathieu Shapiro, Thomas A. Leonard, Nicholas Poduslenko, Melissa Blanco, David Ladov. [23-3277, 23-3275, 23-3276] (MB) [Entered: 01/05/2024 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Mathieu J. Shapiro on behalf of Appellee(s) Hillary J. Moonay, David A. Nasatir, Mathieu Shapiro, Thomas A. Leonard, Nicholas Poduslenko, Melissa M. Blanco, David Ladov. [23-3277, 23-3276, 23-3275] (MS) [Entered: 01/05/2024 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Paul C. Troy, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) Enrico Paganelli, Esq. [23-3277, 23-3275] (PCT) [Entered: 01/05/2024 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 01/02/2024 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (LMR) [Entered: 01/02/2024 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Urve Maggitti in District Court No. 2-23-cv-04359. (LMR) [Entered: 01/02/2024 10:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
