In re: FieldTurf Artificial Turf Marketing & Sales Practi, et al
| In re: FIELDTURF ARTIFICIAL TURF MARKETING & SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION, FIELDTURF USA INC, a Florida Corporation, FIELDTURF INC, a Canadian Corporation, FIELDTURF TARKETT SAS, a French Corporation and TARKETT INC, a Canadian Corporation |
| BOROUGH OF CARTERET, CITY OF FREMONT, COUNTY OF HUDSON, LEVITTOWN UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, NESHANNOCK TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT, NEWARK SCHOOL DISTRICT and SANTA YNEZ VALLEY UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT |
| 23-8033 |
| July 27, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER (SHWARTZ, MATEY and PHIPPS, Circuit Judges) The foregoing Petition for Leave to Appeal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f) is denied. Panel No.: CCO-111. Phipps, Authoring Judge. (TMM) [Entered: 08/24/2023 11:14 AM]
|
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: Response filed by Respondents Borough of Carteret, City of Fremont, County of Hudson, Levittown Union Free School District, Neshannock Township School District, Newark School District and Santa Ynez Valley Union School District to Petition for Permission to Appeal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f). Certificate of Service dated 08/17/2023. [23-8033]--[Edited 08/18/2023 by TMM] (CAS) [Entered: 08/17/2023 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jennifer R. Scullion on behalf of Respondent(s) Borough of Carteret, City of Fremont, County of Hudson, Levittown Union Free School District, Neshannock Township School District, Newark School District, Santa Ynez Valley Union School District. [23-8033] (JRS) [Entered: 08/17/2023 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ORDER (Clerk) granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for Permission to Appeal filed by Respondents County of Hudson, Borough of Carteret, Neshannock Township School District, City of Fremont, Levittown Union Free School District, Newark School District and Santa Ynez Valley Union School District. Respondents' response must be filed on or before August 17, 2023. (DW) [Entered: 08/10/2023 09:25 AM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Respondents Borough of Carteret, City of Fremont, County of Hudson, Levittownn Union Free School District, Neshannock Township School District, Santa Ynez Valley Union High School District and State-Operated School District of the City of Newark for Extension of Time to file Response to the Defendant-Petitioner's Petition for Permission to Appeal under Rule 23(f) of the Federal rules of Civil Procedure. until/for 7 days. Certificate of Service dated 08/03/2023. Service made by ECF. [23-8033] (JEC) [Entered: 08/03/2023 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Gregory Silbert on behalf of Petitioner(s) FieldTurf USA, Inc., FieldTurf Inc., FieldTurf Tarkett SAS, Tarkett, Inc.. [23-8033] (GS) [Entered: 08/01/2023 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (TMM) [Entered: 08/01/2023 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 Petition for Leave to Appeal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f) filed by Petitioners FieldTurf Artificial Turf Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, FieldTurf Inc, FieldTurf Tarkett SAS, Fieldturf USA Inc and Tarkett Inc. Received on 07/27/2023. Certificate of Service dated 07/27/2023. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 08/01/2023 11:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
