Ryan Button v. Dolgencorp Inc, et al
| RYAN BUTTON, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated |
| DOLGENCORP INC, Agent of Dollar General, TODD VASOS, JEFF OWEN, STEVE SUNDERLAND, EMILY TAYLOR and DOLLAR GENERAL CORP |
| 23-8034 |
| August 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC ADDENDUM to PETITION on behalf of Petitioner Ryan Button. Certificate of Service dated 08/24/2023 by ECF. [23-8034] (JLM) [Entered: 08/24/2023 05:31 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) The above-captioned petition seeks permission to appeal an August 9, 2023, order. The order was not, however, attached as an exhibit to the petition. Within seven days, the petitioner must file an addendum containing the district courts order. See Fed. R. App. P. 5(b)(1)(E)(i) (requiring copy of order in addition to opinion). This order does not affect the respondents deadline for answering the petition. (LMR) [Entered: 08/24/2023 04:17 PM]
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (LMR) [Entered: 08/24/2023 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 Petition for Leave to Appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1453(c) Class Action Fairness Act Review of Remand Orders filed by Petitioner Ryan Button. Received on 08/21/2023. Certificate of Service dated 08/21/2023. Service made by US mail, Email. (LMR) [Entered: 08/24/2023 04:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.