Naree Abdullah, et al v. City of Philadelphia, et al
NAREE ABDULLAH, A/K/A GRENILE GAINEY and ERIC GREENE, A/K/A ERIC GREENE |
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, YVONNE RUIZ, OFFICER JOSEPH WALSH and DETECTIVE ANTHONY TOMAINO |
24-1015 |
January 5, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). (CJG) [Entered: 01/19/2024 03:52 PM] |
Filing 11 ECF FILER: Stipulation to Dismiss Case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) filed by Appellants Naree Abdullah and Mr. Eric Greene without costs. Certificate of Service dated 01/19/2024. Service made by Email. [24-1015] (KVM) [Entered: 01/19/2024 03:37 PM] |
Filing 10 ECF FILER: LETTER from Attorney Kevin V. Mincey, Esq. for Appellants Naree Abdullah and Mr. Eric Greene Letter to Court advising of appeal withdrawal. Certificate of Service dated 01/19/2024. Service made by Email. [24-1015] (KVM) [Entered: 01/19/2024 03:17 PM] |
Filing 9 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Yvonne Ruiz to clerk order advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 01/18/2024. [24-1015] (SRS) [Entered: 01/18/2024 10:51 AM] |
Filing 8 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Yvonne Ruiz. [24-1015] (SRS) [Entered: 01/18/2024 10:49 AM] |
Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Shelley R. Smith on behalf of Appellee(s) Yvonne Ruiz. [24-1015] (SRS) [Entered: 01/18/2024 10:48 AM] |
Filing 6 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellees City of Philadelphia, Anthony Tomaino and Joseph Walsh to clerk order. Certificate of Service dated 01/17/2024. [24-1015] (CRG) [Entered: 01/17/2024 04:18 PM] |
Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Craig Gottlieb on behalf of Appellee(s) CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; Detective Anthony Tomaino; and Officer Joseph Walsh. [24-1015] (CRG) [Entered: 01/16/2024 02:07 PM] |
Filing 4 ORDER (Clerk) The plaintiffs have appealed an order dismissing some of their claims, but others remain pending in the district court. The order may not be a "final decision[]" under 28 U.S.C. Section: 1291 or otherwise appealable. See, e.g., Aluminum Co. of Am. v. Beazer E., Inc., 124 F.3d 551, 557 (3d Cir. 1997) ("[T]here is no final order if claims remain unresolved and their resolution is to occur in the district court."); Walter v. Pike Cnty., 544 F.3d 182, 19091 (3d Cir. 2008). Even if the order were appealable, this appeal may be untimely because it was not filed within thirty days. See 28 U.S.C. Section: 2107; Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). All parties must file written responses addressing these issues within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. (AMR) [Entered: 01/05/2024 12:56 PM] |
Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 01/05/2024 12:50 PM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 01/05/2024 12:50 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Naree Abdullah and Jarmaine Trice in District Court No. 2-22-cv-04143. (AMR) [Entered: 01/05/2024 12:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.