Palani Karupaiyan, et al v. USA, et al
| PALANI KARUPAIYAN |
| P. P., Plaintiff Palani Karupaiyan's son and R. P., Plainitff Palani Karupaiyan's daughter |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, UNION OF INDIA, OFFICER GANDHI, (5038) Individually and in his Official Capacity as Parking Enforecemnt OFficer of Woodbridge, KULLAR CONSTRUCTION, JOE KULLAR, Individually and in his Official Capacity as owner of Kullar Construction and AMZA SYED |
| 24-1044 |
| January 8, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: LETTER from Party Palani Karupaiyan Petition for Writ of Mandamus, prohibition or alternative. Certificate of Service dated 01/08/2024. Service made by ECF. [24-1044] (PK) [Entered: 01/09/2024 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Palani Karupaiyan for leave to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 01/08/2024. Service made by ECF. [24-1044] (PK) [Entered: 01/08/2024 06:49 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (SB) [Entered: 01/08/2024 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 01/08/2024 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Palani Karupaiyan in District Court No. 2-23-cv-20928. (SB) [Entered: 01/08/2024 12:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
