Armoni Johnson v. Bienkoski, et al
ARMONI MASUD JOHNSON |
SGT. BIENKOSKI, Dallas State Prison Staff Member, OFFICER CHUBA, Dallas State Prison Staff, ADA, Teacher Aid and RICHARD DEVERS |
24-1049 |
January 10, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Supplemental Argument in support of the appeal filed by Appellant Armoni Masud Johnson. (KR) [Entered: 03/01/2024 08:54 AM] |
Filing 16 Argument in support of the appeal filed by Appellant Armoni Masud Johnson. (KR) [Entered: 03/01/2024 08:51 AM] |
Filing 15 ORDER (Clerk) denying motion to stay appeals and motion to consolidate appeals filed by Appellant Armoni Masud Johnson. (KR) [Entered: 02/15/2024 03:11 PM] |
Filing 14 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Hannah Kogan on behalf of Appellee(s) Sgt. Bienkoski, Officer Chuba, and Richard Devers. [24-1049] (HK) [Entered: 02/14/2024 10:27 AM] |
Filing 13 MOTION filed by Appellant Armoni Masud Johnson to Stay Appeal, to Consolidate Appeals, Argument in support of Appeal and request for exhibits to be accepted. Response due on 02/23/2024. Certificate of Service dated 02/13/2024. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 02/13/2024 10:14 AM] |
Filing 12 ORDER (Clerk) denying motion to stay appeal filed by Appellant Armoni Masud Johnson. (KR) [Entered: 02/06/2024 08:32 AM] |
Filing 11 ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Armoni Masud Johnson. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. (KR) [Entered: 02/06/2024 08:18 AM] |
Filing 10 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Sean A. Kirkpatrick on behalf of Appellee(s) Bienkoski, Chuba, and Devers. [24-1049] (SAK) [Entered: 01/31/2024 02:33 PM] |
Filing 9 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Armoni Masud Johnson. (KR) [Entered: 01/30/2024 11:06 AM] |
Filing 8 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Armoni Masud Johnson. (KR) [Entered: 01/25/2024 03:37 PM] |
Filing 7 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Armoni Masud Johnson. (KR) [Entered: 01/25/2024 03:36 PM] |
Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Armoni Masud Johnson to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 02/05/2024. Certificate of Service dated 01/25/2024. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 01/25/2024 03:34 PM] |
Filing 5 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Attorney Nicole R. Ditomo, Esq. for Appellees Bienkoski, Chuba and Richard Devers requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 02/08/2024. (KR) [Entered: 01/25/2024 09:43 AM] |
Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant Armoni Masud Johnson to Stay Appeal. Response due on 01/29/2024. Certificate of Service dated 01/18/2024. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 01/18/2024 03:40 PM] |
Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (KR) [Entered: 01/10/2024 11:13 AM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 01/10/2024 11:12 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Armoni Masud Johnson in District Court No. 3-18-cv-00592. (KR) [Entered: 01/10/2024 11:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.