Rysheid El v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, et al
| RYSHEID MALIK EL |
| PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAMES F. KENNEY, Mayor, THOMAS DUNDON, CEO RICH LAZER, EMPLOYEE #656 JOHN DOE, LETITIA SANTARELLI and VERUSCHIA DUNDON |
| 24-1345 |
| February 28, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service returned clerk order [ # 5 ] sent to Appellant Rysheid Malik El. Mail was returned because postage is needed. The mail is hereby resent to the existing address on file with correct postage. (CLW) [Entered: 04/10/2024 04:05 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1(a), for failure to pay the filing fee for the notice of appeal. Case terminated on 03/26/2024. (CLW) [Entered: 03/26/2024 10:37 AM]
|
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (ZM) [Entered: 03/04/2024 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (CLW) [Entered: 02/28/2024 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CLW) [Entered: 02/28/2024 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Rysheid Malik El in District Court No. 2-23-cv-03223. (CLW) [Entered: 02/28/2024 12:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
