USA v. Amin Rashid
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| AMIN A. RASHID |
| 24-1368 |
| March 1, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Attorney Vineet Gauri, Esq. for Appellee USA requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 04/24/2024. (PDB) [Entered: 04/10/2024 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 10 Copy of Amended Notice of Appeal filed 04/09/2024 received from Clerk of District Court. (PDB) [Entered: 04/10/2024 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 9 STATUS REPORT received from Appellant Mr. Amin A. Rashid. (PDB) [Entered: 04/09/2024 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 8 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (SH) [Entered: 03/27/2024 08:04 AM] |
| Filing 7 COPY OF OPINION/ORDER OF DISTRICT COURT dated 03/14/2024 denying Motion for Reconsideration signed by Cynthia M. Rufe. (PDB) [Entered: 03/15/2024 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 6 COPY OF OPINION/ORDER OF DISTRICT COURT dated 03/14/2024, It is hereby ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability as to the denial of Amin Rashid's Motion for Permission to File a Motion to Vacate Order Denying 2255 Motion, as there is no basis for concluding that "reasonable jurists could debate whether. the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further. signed by Cynthia M. Rufe. (PDB) [Entered: 03/15/2024 11:12 AM] |
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) remanding appeal to District Court for the purpose of either issuance of a certificate of appealability or a statement of reasons why one should not issue. The appeal is STAYED pending determination by the District Court. It is ordered that the parties file a status report to be filed on or before 04/03/2024 and every 30 days thereafter until a determination is made by the District Court. (PDB) [Entered: 03/04/2024 02:18 PM]
|
| Filing 4 CLERK ORDER - RULE 4(a)(4) staying case pending disposition of post decision motion(s). (PDB) [Entered: 03/04/2024 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (PDB) [Entered: 03/01/2024 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 03/01/2024 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Amin A. Rashid in District Court No. 2-08-cr-00493-001. (PDB) [Entered: 03/01/2024 03:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Amin Rashid | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Vineet Gauri Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AMIN A. RASHID | |
| Represented By: | Amin A. Rashid |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
