Carl Bell v. Kim Ardery, et al
| CARL EDWARD BELL |
| KIM ARDERY, Medical Care Supervisor/CHCA at SCI- Benner Township, MORRIS HOUSER, Superintendent, GEORGE LITTLE, Secretary of Department of Corrections and TIFFANY SOTTILE, Nurse/CRPN |
| 24-1373 |
| February 28, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER (Clerk) The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. (CJG) [Entered: 04/16/2024 03:10 PM]
|
| Filing 12 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Carl Edward Bell. (CJG) [Entered: 04/10/2024 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 11 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Carl Edward Bell. (CJG) [Entered: 04/10/2024 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 10 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Carl Edward Bell. (CJG) [Entered: 04/10/2024 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Carl Edward Bell to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (CJG) [Entered: 04/10/2024 12:21 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion is granted to the extent Appellant is requesting an extension of time to file his motion to proceed in forma pauperis and all other required financial forms. Within 30 days of the date of this order, Appellant must file and serve a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, with required documents. To the extent Appellant seeks an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, the motion is denied without prejudice to renewal in the District Court as the Court of Appeals cannot extend the time to file a notice of appeal. [-See Order for Full Text.] (CJG) [Entered: 03/28/2024 03:43 PM]
|
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Howard G. Hopkirk on behalf of Appellee(s) George Little, Morris Houser, and Kim Ardery. [24-1373] (HGH) [Entered: 03/25/2024 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Carl Edward Bell for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(5)(A)(i), Fed. R. App. P. Response, if any, due on 03/25/2024. Certificate of Service dated 03/11/2024. Service made by US mail. (CJG) [Entered: 03/18/2024 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 5 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Jonathan M Blake, Esq. and Erich T. Greiner, Esq. for Appellees Morris Houser, George Little and Kim Ardery & Mark C. Derner, Esq., Daniel J. Margonari, Esq. and Stuart T. O'Neal, III, Esq. for Appellee Tiffany Sottile requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 04/01/2024. (CJG) [Entered: 03/18/2024 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 03/05/2024 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (CJG) [Entered: 02/28/2024 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 02/28/2024 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Carl Edward Bell in District Court No. 1-22-cv-02003. (CJG) [Entered: 02/28/2024 03:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
