Justin Shaffer v. Daryl Bloom, et al
JUSTIN ERIC SHAFFER |
DARYL F. BLOOM, Assistant Supervisor Attorney Prosecutor, CARLO D. MARCHIOLI, Assistant USA Attorney, JOHN C. GURGANUS, JR., United States Attorney (Primary Defendant), AMBER WILSON, Special Agent of FBI, ADAM IVES, Special Agent of FBI, JOHN L. RICHARDS, Deputy State Game Warden, AARON MEYER, Former Chief of Police, Lt. Colonel of NSA Police and PAUL DOWNEY, Former Chief Deputy NSA Police Investigator |
24-1828 |
May 9, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from AUSA Patrick J. Bannon on behalf of Appellee(s) DARYL F. BLOOM; CARLO D. MARCHIOLI; JOHN C. GURGANUS, JR.; AMBER WILSON; ADAM IVES; AARON MEYER; PAUL DOWNEY. [24-1828] (PJB) [Entered: 05/10/2024 11:08 AM] |
Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Michael J. Scarinci on behalf of Appellee(s) John L. Richards. [24-1828] (MJS) [Entered: 05/10/2024 10:45 AM] |
Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (ARR) [Entered: 05/09/2024 05:20 PM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (ARR) [Entered: 05/09/2024 05:19 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Justin Eric Shaffer in District Court No. 1-23-cv-00676. (ARR) [Entered: 05/09/2024 05:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.