LaShawn Fitch v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
| LASHAWN D. FITCH |
| VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, individually and her oficial capacity, LT. MICHAEL CRAWFORD, individually and his official capacity, RAYMOND ROYCE, Administrator, individually and his official capacity and MAJOR CRAIG SEARS, individually and his official capacity |
| 24-2143 |
| June 24, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant LaShawn D. Fitch. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. (LMR) [Entered: 08/15/2024 10:03 AM]
|
| Filing 12 Declaration filed by Appellant LaShawn D. Fitch in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (CJG) [Entered: 08/13/2024 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 11 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant LaShawn D. Fitch. (CJG) [Entered: 08/13/2024 10:19 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motions are considered. No action will be taken on the Appellants letter dated July 9, 2024, construed as a motion for extension of time to file prison account statement as it is unnecessary. Appellant states he is unable to obtain a copy of his six-month prison account statement, it is noted that Section 28 USC section 1915(a)(2) requires that a prisoner shall submit a certified copy of the trust account statement. Accordingly, as submission of a certified copy of the prison account statement is mandatory to obtain in forma pauperis status. Appellants motion filed on July 22, 2022, for extension of time to file a prison account statement is granted. Appellant may have an additional twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order to file his account statement. (LMR) [Entered: 07/25/2024 10:14 AM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant LaShawn D. Fitch for Extension of Time to File Prison Account Statement. Certificate of Service dated 07/16/2024. Service made by US mail. (LMR) [Entered: 07/24/2024 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 8 Letter filed by Appellant LaShawn D. Fitch construed as a motion for extension of time to file prison account statement. (LMR) [Entered: 07/22/2024 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 7 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant LaShawn D. Fitch. (LMR) [Entered: 07/22/2024 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 6 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant LaShawn D. Fitch. (LMR) [Entered: 07/22/2024 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant LaShawn D. Fitch to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (LMR) [Entered: 07/22/2024 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 06/26/2024 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 06/24/2024 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (LMR) [Entered: 06/24/2024 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant LaShawn D. Fitch in District Court No. 3-22-cv-05884. (LMR) [Entered: 06/24/2024 02:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.