Omayra Diaz v. Michelle Merced, et al
| OMAYRA DIAZ |
| OFFICER JOSHUA TORRES, #457, SGT. MICHELLE MERCED, #391, CITY OF PASSAIC, New Jersey, OFFICER ROBERTO CANCEL, #430 and OFFICER STEVEN GIL, #434 |
| 24-2208 |
| July 8, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service returned Case Opening Packet [ # 1 ], letter [ # 12 ], letter [ # 7 ] sent to Appellant Omayra Diaz. Mail was returned with the envelopes marked "vacant". No forwarding address is available. (CJG) [Entered: 08/29/2024 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 12 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service returned clerk order [ # 6 ] sent to Appellant Omayra Diaz. Mail was returned with the envelope marked "no such number, unable to forward." It is noted that the Court had an incorrect zip code listed for Appellant's address. The address has been updated and mail resent. The deadline for filing Appellant's brief is extended by 40 days from the date of this letter. (CJG) [Entered: 07/30/2024 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: CORRECTED ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Peter P. Perla, Jr. on behalf of Appellee(s) Sgt. Michelle Merced, Officer Robert Cancel, Officer Joshua Torres, Officer Steven Gil and City of Passaic. [24-2208]--[Edited 07/29/2024 by CJG] (PPP) [Entered: 07/29/2024 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Peter P. Perla, Jr. on behalf of Appellee(s) Sgt. Michelle Merced, Officer Robert Cancel, Officer Joshua Torres, Officer Steven Gil and City of Passaic. --[Edited 07/29/2024 by CJG to remove document, as corrected document has been filed.] [24-2208] (PPP) [Entered: 07/29/2024 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 9 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service returned briefing notice [ # 4 ] sent to Appellant Omayra Diaz. Mail was returned with the envelope marked "vacant, unable to forward". No forwarding address is available. (CJG) [Entered: 07/29/2024 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Susie B. Burns, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) City of Passaic, Sgt. Michelle Merced, Officer Robert Cancel, Officer Joshua Torres, and Officer Steven Gil.. [24-2208] (SBB) [Entered: 07/26/2024 05:05 PM] |
| Filing 7 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Susan B. Burns, Esq. and Peter Paul Perla, Jr., Esq. for Appellees City of Passaic, Michelle Merced, Roberto Cancel, Joshua Torres and Steven Gil requesting Appearance Form on or before 08/07/2024. (CJG) [Entered: 07/24/2024 11:14 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER (Clerk) no action will be taken on motion to proceed in forma pauperis as it is unnecessary. It is noted that the District Court previously granted Appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (CJG) [Entered: 07/18/2024 03:26 PM]
|
| Filing 4 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Omayra Diaz due on or before 08/19/2024. Appendix due on or before 08/19/2024. (CJG) [Entered: 07/10/2024 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Omayra Diaz to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (CJG) [Entered: 07/15/2024 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (CJG) [Entered: 07/08/2024 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 07/08/2024 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Omayra Diaz in District Court No. 2-21-cv-11831. (CJG) [Entered: 07/08/2024 10:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.