Shawn King v. Barry Smith, et al
| SHAWN KING |
| DAVID CLOSE, Deputy Superintendent, BARRY SMITH, Superintendent, BOBBI JO SALAMON, Deputy Superintendent/PRC, MICHELLE IVIC, Deputy Superintendent and LUCINDA GAINEY, Mail Inspector Supervisor |
| 24-2428 |
| August 1, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER (Clerk) Motion by appellant for Leave to File Addendum to Informal Brief. To the extent the informal brief and the proposed addendum are treated as documents in support of the appeal, the motion will be referred to the same panel that will consider jurisdiction and a determination under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) as to whether the appeal will be dismissed as legally frivolous or whether summary action is appropriate. (CLW) [Entered: 09/20/2024 11:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER (Clerk) No action will be taken on the foregoing motions as it is unnecessary. It is noted that Appellant was granted leave to proceed in forma puperis by Clerk's Order entered August 15, 2024. With respect to Appellants request for clarification, Appellant is advised that the facility has updated the fiing fee deduction percentage to 20% pursuant to the Clerk's Order entered August 15, 2024. (CLW) [Entered: 09/10/2024 05:09 PM]
|
| Filing 19 ADDENDUM to Pro Se Informal Brief construed as a Document in Support of the Appeal on behalf of Appellant Shawn King, received. Copies: 1, Certificate of Service dated 09/04/2024. (DW) [Entered: 09/04/2024 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION filed by Appellant Shawn King for Leave to File Addendum to Informal Brief at ECF #11 construed as a document in support of the appeal. Response due on 09/16/2024. Certificate of Service dated 09/04/2024. Service made by ECF. (DW) [Entered: 09/04/2024 04:57 PM] |
| Filing 17 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Shawn King. (DW) [Entered: 09/04/2024 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 16 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Shawn King. (DW) [Entered: 09/04/2024 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 15 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Shawn King. (DW) [Entered: 09/04/2024 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION filed by Appellant Shawn King to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 09/16/2024. Certificate of Service dated 09/04/2024. Service made by ECF. (DW) [Entered: 09/04/2024 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION filed by Appellant Shawn King to Clarify Order dated 08/15/2024. Response due on 09/09/2024. Certificate of Service dated 08/26/2024. Service made by US mail. (CLW) [Entered: 08/29/2024 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 12 DUPLICATE PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Shawn King. (CLW) [Entered: 08/29/2024 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 11 Brief Received. As no briefing schedule has yet issued, the brief is construed as a document in support of the appeal. If after disposition of the pending motions the appeal is to proceed to briefing, the parties will be advised regarding the filing date. Service made by Clerk's Office on 08/15/2024 via filing on ECF. [Brief received in office on 08/02/2024 pending resolution of fee issue]. (ARR) [Entered: 08/19/2024 09:02 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motions are considered. Appellants motion to apprise the Court of interference is construed as request for leave to file Appellants prisoner account statement out of time. So construed, the motion is granted with filing as of August 13, 2024. Also granting the motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Shawn King. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. (DW) [Entered: 08/15/2024 01:04 PM]
|
| Filing 8 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Shawn King. (CLW) [Entered: 08/13/2024 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Shawn King Motion by Appellant to Aprise the Court of Inteference by Prison Officials. Response due on 08/08/2024. Certificate of Service dated 07/25/2024. Service made by US mail. (CLW) [Entered: 08/13/2024 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Shawn King to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 08/08/2024. Certificate of Service dated 07/25/2024. Service made by US mail. (CLW) [Entered: 08/13/2024 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Daniel B. Mullen on behalf of Appellee(s) Barry Smith; Bobbi Jo Salamon; David Close; Lucinda Gainey; Michelle Ivic. [24-2428] (DBM) [Entered: 08/06/2024 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 5 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (SH) [Entered: 08/05/2024 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 4 COPY OF DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER dated July 22, 2024, sent by Appellant Shawn King. Certificate of Service dated 07/31/2024. Service made by US mail. (ARR) [Entered: 08/02/2024 05:30 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (CLW) [Entered: 08/01/2024 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CLW) [Entered: 08/01/2024 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Shawn King in District Court No. 3-20-cv-00243. (CLW) [Entered: 08/01/2024 02:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
