Oliver Vaughn Douce v. DCP&P, et al
| OLIVER VAUGHN DOUCE |
| COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER TOMS RIVER, MADELIN EINBINDER, KEITH MILLER, KERI POPKIN, MORGAN KOWSKY, CARINA SHORTINO, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, PAMELA PETERSEN, MELISSA H. RASKA, ALEXIS POLLOCK, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, MICHELE SCENNA, KENNETH MCTIGUE, DR. PUGLIA and LORI LESSIN, PSY |
| 24-2592 |
| August 29, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). (KR) [Entered: 09/12/2024 04:30 PM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Oliver Vaughn Douce to Dismiss Appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Certificate of Service dated 09/12/2024. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 09/12/2024 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 09/04/2024 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (KR) [Entered: 08/29/2024 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 08/29/2024 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Oliver Vaughn Douce in District Court No. 3-23-cv-21737. (KR) [Entered: 08/29/2024 09:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
