Rodney Anderson v. Kevin Kauffman, et al
| RODNEY ANDERSON |
| KEVIN KAUFFMAN, Superintendent of SCI-Huntingdon, MS. COUSINS and C. NERI, Psychologist Department at SCI-Huntingdon |
| 24-2932 |
| October 17, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Rodney Anderson v. Kevin Kauffman |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Rodney Anderson. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order; referring to a motions panel the motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Rodney Anderson. (CLW) [Entered: 12/03/2024 11:26 AM]
|
| Filing 14 Document filed by Appellant in Support of Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Certificate of Service dated 11/05/2024. Service made by US mail. (CLW) [Entered: 11/13/2024 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 13 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Rodney Anderson. (ARR) [Entered: 11/08/2024 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 12 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Rodney Anderson. (ARR) [Entered: 11/08/2024 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 11 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Rodney Anderson. (ARR) [Entered: 11/08/2024 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION filed by Appellant Rodney Anderson to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 10/29/2024. Service made by US mail. (ARR) [Entered: 11/08/2024 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Cassidy L. Neal, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) Jessica Cousins. [24-2932] (CLN) [Entered: 10/25/2024 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 8 Notifying appellant that no action will be taken on the motion for appoinment of counsel as appellant has not submitted a motion for in forma pauperis and 6 month prison account statement. Appellant is directed to file a motion for in forma pauperis and 6 month prison account statement within 14 days from date of notice. (CLW) [Entered: 10/24/2024 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Rodney Anderson for Appointment of Counsel, received and not filed. Certificate of Service dated 10/16/2024. Service made by US mail. (CLW) [Entered: 10/24/2024 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 6 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Rodney Anderson. (CLW) [Entered: 10/24/2024 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 5 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Rodney Anderson. (CLW) [Entered: 10/24/2024 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Vincent R. Mazeski on behalf of Appellee(s) Kauffman, Rivello, Neri, Green, Wakefield, Wetzel, Murtha, Hammon, Yost, Hicks-Kern, Pattersons and Mel. [24-2932] (VRM) [Entered: 10/18/2024 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (GCH) [Entered: 10/17/2024 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (GCH) [Entered: 10/17/2024 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Rodney Anderson in District Court No. 1-22-cv-00226. (GCH) [Entered: 10/17/2024 12:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
