In re: Michael Stokes
| In re: MICHAEL STOKES |
| WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI |
| 24-2948 |
| October 21, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NONCOMPLIANCE (Order) Action on the above-captioned petition for writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") is hereby deferred. The IFP motion submitted with the mandamus petition was not sufficiently complete for the Court to rule on at this time. It did not include (1) an affidavit of poverty in the form prescribed by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and (2) a statement of Petitioner's institutional account for the six months prior to this date. The petitioner must provide those documents to this Court if he wants to proceed in forma pauperis. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 24.1(c). Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either remit payment of the $600 docketing fee or complete his IFP motion by filing the required affidavit of poverty and account statement. A form affidavit is enclosed for Petitioner's convenience. The mandamus petition will not be submitted to the Court until the docketing fee has been paid or leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been granted. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(3). If neither the fee nor a compliant IFP motion is received by the deadline, the petition will be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 3.3(a), 24.2, 107.1(a). Compliance due 11/04/2024. (AMR) [Entered: 10/21/2024 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Michael Stokes to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 10/10/2024. Service made by US mail. (AMR) [Entered: 10/21/2024 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Michael Stokes. (AMR) [Entered: 10/21/2024 03:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Michael Stokes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL STOKES | |
| Represented By: | Michael Stokes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI | |
| Represented By: | G. Michael Thiel Esq. |
| Represented By: | Timothy S. Judge Esq. |
| Represented By: | Richard Euliss Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
