Kareem Stansbury v. Laurel Harry, et al
Plaintiff: KAREEM J. STANSBURY
Defendant: LAUREL HARRY, Secretary of Correction and SMITH, Counselor on E-Blk SCI-Camp Hill
Case Number: 25-1109
Filed: January 21, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1(a), for failure to pay the filing fee for the notice of appeal. It is further noted that pursuant to the letter received from Appellant on February 7, 2025, Appellant no longer wishes to pursue this appeal. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE TEXT. Case terminated on 02/13/2025. (ARR) [Entered: 02/13/2025 03:50 PM]
February 7, 2025 Filing 7 LETTER MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kareem J. Stansbury to Withdraw Appeal. Certificate of Service dated 01/25/2025. Service made by US mail. (ARR) [Entered: 02/07/2025 05:52 PM]
February 4, 2025 Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Michael J. Scarinci on behalf of Appellee(s) Laurel Harry, Michael Gourley, Zachary Molsak, William Nicklaw, Randy Evans, Lindsey Kendall, Jason Albert, Douglas Benner, Lori Newsome, Bradley Ritchey, Erin Miller, Lorah, Courtney Fuller, D. Dickey, Nicole Dodson. [25-1109] (MJS) [Entered: 02/04/2025 09:57 AM]
January 28, 2025 Filing 5 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (SH) [Entered: 01/28/2025 11:22 AM]
January 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER (Clerk) for all parties represented by Erich Thomas Greiner, Esq. the designated filer shall be Laurel Harry. (GCH) [Entered: 01/21/2025 04:23 PM]
January 21, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (GCH) [Entered: 01/21/2025 04:14 PM]
January 21, 2025 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (GCH) [Entered: 01/21/2025 04:14 PM]
January 21, 2025 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Kareem J. Stansbury in District Court No. 1:24-cv-00686. (GCH) [Entered: 01/21/2025 04:02 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kareem Stansbury v. Laurel Harry, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KAREEM J. STANSBURY
Represented By: Kareem J. Stansbury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAUREL HARRY, Secretary of Correction
Represented By: Erich T. Greiner Esq.
Represented By: Michael J. Scarinci Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SMITH, Counselor on E-Blk SCI-Camp Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?