Calvin Camps v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
| CALVIN CAMPS |
| SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA |
| 25-1212 |
| February 4, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK LETTER SENT to Appellant Mr. Calvin Camps in response to Appellant's 2/10/2025 letter (JK) [Entered: 02/11/2025 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 6 LETTER filed by Appellant Calvin Camps. (JK) [Entered: 02/11/2025 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jaclyn Mason on behalf of Appellee(s) Supt. Phoenix SCI; District Attorney Philadelphia; Attorney General Pennsylvania. [25-1212] (JMM) [Entered: 02/07/2025 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect AND for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (MW) [Entered: 02/06/2025 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (GCH) [Entered: 02/04/2025 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (GCH) [Entered: 02/04/2025 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Calvin Camps in District Court No. 2:23-cv-02046. (GCH) [Entered: 02/04/2025 03:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
