USA v. Nathaniel Swint
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: NATHANIEL SWINT
Case Number: 25-1388
Filed: March 7, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2025 Filing 20 MANDATE ISSUED. (KR) [Entered: 07/18/2025 08:25 AM]
July 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER (CHAGARES, Chief Judge, HARDIMAN, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, PORTER, MATEY, PHIPPS, FREEMAN, MONTGOMERY-REEVES and CHUNG, Circuit Judges) denying Petition for en banc rehearing and denying Petition for panel rehearing filed by Appellant Mr. Nathaniel Swint. Bibas , Authoring Judge. (PDB) [Entered: 07/10/2025 02:11 PM]
June 24, 2025 Filing 18 PETITION filed by Appellant Mr. Nathaniel Swint for Rehearing En Banc and before Original Panel. Certificate of Service dated 06/03/2025. (PDB) [Entered: 06/24/2025 02:55 PM]
June 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER (BIBAS, Circuit Judge) granting motion to file rehearing exhibits filed by Appellant Mr. Nathaniel Swint. Bibas, Authoring Judge. (PDB) [Entered: 06/24/2025 02:51 PM]
June 20, 2025 Filing 16 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Nathaniel Swint to File Exhibits to Petition for Rehearing. Certificate of Service dated 06/17/2025. Service made by US mail. (PDB) [Entered: 06/24/2025 11:17 AM]
June 12, 2025 Filing 15 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Appellant Mr. Nathaniel Swint requesting compliance for Petition for Rehearing Petition received in the office and not filed. (PDB) [Entered: 06/12/2025 12:12 PM]
May 27, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER (HARDIMAN, BIBAS and FREEMAN, Circuit Judges) granting motion by Appellee for Summary Affirmance and for Leave to be Excused from Filing a Brief Pursuant to LAR 31.2. Panel ID: ACO-100 Judge: BIBAS Authoring (GCH) [Entered: 05/27/2025 11:38 AM]
May 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion and response are referred to a motions panel. The briefing schedule is hereby stayed pending disposition of the motion for summary affirmance and for leave to be excused from filing a brief. If the motion is denied in its entirety, Appellee's brief must be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of the order denying the motion. (PDB) [Entered: 05/14/2025 11:29 AM]
April 30, 2025 Filing 12 INFORMAL MEMORANDUM RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Mr. Nathaniel Swint to motion for summary action. Certificate of Service dated 04/29/2025. Service made by US mail. (PDB) [Entered: 05/02/2025 09:29 AM]
April 22, 2025 Filing 11 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellee USA to summarily affirm. Certificate of Service dated 04/22/2025. Service made by US mail, ECF. [25-1388] (SGZ) [Entered: 04/22/2025 09:52 AM]
April 15, 2025 Filing 10 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Shannon Zabel on behalf of Appellee(s) USA. [25-1388] (SGZ) [Entered: 04/15/2025 10:57 AM]
April 11, 2025 Filing 9 PRO SE INFORMAL BRIEF on behalf of Appellant Mr. Nathaniel Swint. Pages: 5, Certificate of Service dated 04/09/2025 by US mail. (KEL) [Entered: 04/11/2025 05:02 PM]
March 27, 2025 Filing 8 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (PDB) [Entered: 03/27/2025 12:50 PM]
March 27, 2025 Filing 7 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Nathaniel Swint due on or before 05/06/2025. Appendix due on or before 05/06/2025. (PDB) [Entered: 03/27/2025 12:48 PM]
March 27, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion is granted. The Court may reconsider in forma pauperis status or request additional information at any time during the course of these proceedings. (PDB) [Entered: 03/27/2025 12:39 PM]
March 21, 2025 Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Nathaniel Swint to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (PDB) [Entered: 03/25/2025 11:52 AM]
March 9, 2025 Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert Zauzmer on behalf of Appellee(s) United States of America. [25-1388] (RAZ) [Entered: 03/09/2025 09:27 PM]
March 7, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (PDB) [Entered: 03/07/2025 10:12 AM]
March 7, 2025 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (Partial Record Available) (PDB) [Entered: 03/07/2025 10:12 AM]
March 7, 2025 Filing 1 CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Mr. Nathaniel Swint in District Court No. 2:94-cr-00276-1. (PDB) [Entered: 03/07/2025 10:09 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Nathaniel Swint
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Robert A. Zauzmer Esq.
Represented By: Shannon G. Zabel Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NATHANIEL SWINT
Represented By: Nathaniel Swint
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?